Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372247›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2020

Red Blood Cells Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) and Red Blood Distribution Width (RDW) Parameters as Potential Indicators of Regenerative Potential in Older Patients and Predictors of Acute Mortality - Preliminary Report.

Katarzyna Brzeźniakiewicz-Janus, Joanna Rupa-Matysek, Andrzej Tukiendorf, Tomasz Janus, Mirosław Franków, Marcus Daniel Lancé, Lidia Gil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A prediction model of elderly hip fracture mortality including preoperative red cell distribution width constructed based on the random survival forest (RSF) and Cox risk ratio regression.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Katarzyna Brzeźniakiewicz-JanusDepartment of Hematology, Multi-Specialist Hospital Gorzów Wielkopolski, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Zielona Góra, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland. k.brzezniakiewicz@wp.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-5778
Joanna Rupa-MatysekDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1585-6410
Andrzej TukiendorfDepartment of Public Health, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5278-989X
Tomasz JanusDepartment of Forensic and Clinical Toxicology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-2196
Mirosław FrankówDepartment of Hematology, Multi-Specialist Hospital Gorzów Wielkopolski, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Zielona Góra, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1157-3149
Marcus Daniel LancéDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-0531
Lidia GilDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-3637
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLHamad Medical Corporation · QAPomeranian Medical University · PLUniversity of Zielona Góra · PLWroclaw Medical University · PLWyższa Szkoła Biznesu w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents the statistical results of patients who had been recently discharged from hospital within one month after their treatment in the emergency department (ED). Using routine (14,881) MCV and RDW measurements and statistical tools, we could predict acute mortality in these patients (N = 1158), adjusted for age. It is likely that an increase in the MCV and RDW parameters may correlate in some of our older patients with a poor prognosis with an increased level of circulating IGF-I, which affects red blood cell parameters. The research presents the prognostic statistics of the analyzed clinical factors as well as speculates on the potential correlation of these parameters with the regenerative potential of stem-cell compartment. Analysis shows that both MCV and RDW are statistically significant (Area Under Curve [AUC], lower CI 95% >50%) predictors of acute mortality in ED patients. The classification of patients based on their MCV threshold (= 92.2 units) indicates a proper clinical prognosis in nearly 6 of 10 subjects (AUC >58%), whereas taking into account RDW (=13.8%) indicates a proper clinical prognosis in no more than 7 of 10 individuals. The report concludes that by employing strongly fitting (95%) quadratic modeling of the ORs against the biomarkers studied, one can notice a similar relationship between MCV and RDW as diagnostic tools to predict regenerative potential and clinical outcomes in older patients. Although RDW alone had a 10% higher diagnostic value in terms of predicting early death in the emergency department in patients that were admitted to the ED and subsequently hospitalized, also taking the MCV measurement improved accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes by 2.5% compared to RDW alone.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte IndicesMortalityAdultAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalOdds RatioPrognosisRegenerationROC CurveAcute mortalityGHIGF-IMCVMean corpuscular volumeRDVRed blood distribution widthVSELs

Identifiers

PMID32372247
PMCPMC7392927
OpenAlexW3021278977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.