ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020
Nails as a primary sample type for molecular genetic identification of highly decomposed human remains.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A retrospective case review of decedents recovered from aquatic environments in Cape Town, South Africa.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Impact of Semi-Permanent Nail Polish on Forensic DNA Profiling and Phenotyping from Fingernails.Genes · 2026Article
- Nails as optimal source of DNA for molecular identification of 5 decomposed bodies recovered from seawater: from Y-ancestry to personal identification.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- Suitability of specific soft tissue swabs for the forensic identification of highly decomposed bodies.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For identification of badly preserved cadavers, only a few tissues can be used as a source of DNA, mostly bones and teeth, from which sampling and DNA extraction are difficult and time-consuming. In most highly decomposed remains, the nails are preserved. The aim of this study was to evaluate nails as an alternative source of DNA instead of bones and teeth in demanding routine identification cases. An automated extraction method was optimized on nails obtained from 33 cadavers with a post-mortem interval (PMI) up to 5 years. The commercially available EZ1 Investigator Kit (Qiagen) was used for extraction, and the G2 buffer included in the kit was replaced with TN
Indexed as
Identifiers
32372234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.