Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372186›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

The efficacy of the prenatal administration of Lactobacillus reuteri LR92 DSM 26866 on the prevention of infantile colic: a randomized control trial.

Mohammad Ali Pourmirzaiee, Fatemeh Famouri, Wida Moazeni, Akbar Hassanzadeh, Maryam Hajihashemi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Impact ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The role of potential probiotic strainsFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Nutrients · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad Ali PourmirzaieeDepartment of Pediatrics, Imam Hossein Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh FamouriDepartment of Pediatrics, Imam Hossein Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Famouri@med.mui.ac.ir.
Wida MoazeniDepartment of Pediatrics, Imam Hossein Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Akbar HassanzadehDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
Maryam HajihashemiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beheshti Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Imam Hossein Hospital · IRUniversity of Isfahan · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infantile colic is a functional gastrointestinal disease of the infancy that its cause has not yet been properly identified. It leads to severe discomfort in the infants and anxiety in their mothers. Probiotics have recently been recommended as an effective treatment for the improvement of infantile colic. The objective of this study is to determine the role of prenatal administration of Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) LR92 DSM 26866 on the occurrence of infantile colic. This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted with healthy pregnant women from December 2017 to December 2018 in Isfahan, Iran. A total of 145 patients was included in this study. The case group consisted of 87 pregnant women, who received daily doses of 1 × 10

Indexed as

ColicLimosilactobacillus reuteriProbioticsChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantMothersPregnancyTreatment OutcomeInfantile colicInfantsLactobacillus reuteri LR92 DSM 26866Probiotics

Identifiers

PMID32372186
OpenAlexW3023169287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.