Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372182›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2020

Lumboperitoneal shunt in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective controlled study.

Massimiliano Todisco, Marta Picascia, Patrizia Pisano, Roberta Zangaglia, Brigida Minafra, Paolo Vitali, Elisa Rognone, Anna Pichiecchio, Roberto Ceravolo, Nicola Vanacore and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Massimiliano TodiscoParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6527-3558
Marta PicasciaAlzheimer's Disease Assessment Unit/Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Patrizia PisanoNeurosurgery Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Roberta ZangagliaParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Brigida MinafraParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Paolo VitaliNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Elisa RognoneNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Anna PichiecchioNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Roberto CeravoloUnit of Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Nicola VanacoreNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Alfonso FasanoMorton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Claudio PacchettiParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy. claudio.pacchetti@mondino.it.
Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino · ITFoundation Center · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

Health-Service of Lombardy RF-2013-02355908Italian Ministry of Health RF-2013-02355908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this prospective, controlled, monocentric study, we described the clinical and neuroimaging 12-month follow-up of two parallel cohorts of subjects with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), who did or did not undergo lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS).

methodsWe recruited 78 iNPH patients. At baseline, subjects underwent clinical and neuropsychological assessments, 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and tap test. After baseline, 44 patients (LPS group) opted for LPS implantation, whereas 34 subjects (control group) declined surgery. Both cohorts were then followed up for 12 months through scheduled clinical and neuropsychological evaluations every 6 months. 3 T MRI was repeated at 12-month follow-up.

resultsGait, balance, and urinary continence improved in the LPS group, without significant influence on cognitive functions. Conversely, gait and urinary continence worsened in the control group. No preoperative MRI parameter was significant outcome predictor after LPS. Of relevance, in responders to LPS, we found postoperative reduction of periventricular white matter (PWM) hyperintensities, which were instead increased in the control group.

conclusionsLPS is safe and effective in iNPH. An early surgical treatment is desirable to prevent clinical worsening. Post-surgery decrease of PWM hyperintensities may be a useful MRI marker surrogate for clinical effectiveness of LPS.

Indexed as

Hydrocephalus, Normal PressureHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusLumboperitoneal shuntMagnetic resonance imagingOutcomeProspective study

Identifiers

PMID32372182
OpenAlexW3022991745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.