Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32371989›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Geophysical monitoring of simulated homicide burials for forensic investigations.

Jamie K Pringle, Ian G Stimpson, Kristopher D Wisniewski, Vivienne Heaton, Ben Davenward, Natalie Mirosch, Francesca Spencer, Jon R Jervis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jamie K PringleSchool of Geography, Geology & Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom. j.k.pringle@keele.ac.uk.
Ian G StimpsonSchool of Geography, Geology & Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
Kristopher D WisniewskiDepartment of Criminal Justice and Forensics, School of Law, Policing & Forensics, Science Centre, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, United Kingdom.
Vivienne HeatonSchool of Chemical & Physical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
Ben DavenwardSchool of Geography, Geology & Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
Natalie MiroschSchool of Chemical & Physical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
Francesca SpencerDepartment of Biochemistry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America.
Jon R JervisSchool of Geography, Geology & Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finding hidden bodies, believed to have been murdered and buried, is problematic, expensive in terms of human resource and currently has low success rates for law enforcement agencies. Here we present, for the first time, ten years of multidisciplinary geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using animal analogues. Results will provide forensic search teams with crucial information on optimal detection techniques, equipment configuration and datasets for comparison to active and unsolved cold case searches. Electrical Resistivity (ER) surveys showed a naked burial produced large, low-resistivity anomalies for up to four years, but then the body became difficult to image. A wrapped burial had consistent small, high-resistivity anomalies for four years, then large high-resistivity anomalies until the survey period end. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) 110-900 MHz surveys showed the wrapped burial could be detected throughout. 225 MHz GPR data was optimal, but the naked burial was poorly imaged after six years. Results suggested conducting both ER and GPR surveys if the burial style was unknown when searching for interred remains. Surveys in winter and spring produced the best datasets, and, as post-burial time increases, surveying in these seasons became increasingly important. This multidisciplinary study provides critical new insights for law enforcement and families of the disappeared worldwide.

Identifiers

PMID32371989
PMCPMC7200741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.