Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32371918›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Distinct and combined responses to environmental geometry and features in a working-memory reorientation task in rats and chicks.

Sang Ah Lee, Joseph M Austen, Valeria Anna Sovrano, Giorgio Vallortigara, Anthony McGregor, Colin Lever

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sang Ah LeeDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea. sangah.lee@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-6067
Joseph M AustenDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Valeria Anna SovranoCentre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Giorgio VallortigaraCentre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Anthony McGregorDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Colin LeverDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-2885

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M008975/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The original provocative formulation of the 'geometric module' hypothesis was based on a working-memory task in rats which suggested that spontaneous reorientation behavior is based solely on the environmental geometry and is impervious to featural cues. Here, we retested that claim by returning to a spontaneous navigation task with rats and domestic chicks, using a single prominent featural cue (a striped wall) within a rectangular arena. Experiments 1 and 2 tested the influence of geometry and features separately. In Experiment 1, we found that both rats and chicks used environmental geometry to compute locations in a plain rectangular arena. In Experiment 2, while chicks failed to spontaneously use a striped wall in a square arena, rats showed a modest influence of the featural cue as a local marker to the goal. The critical third experiment tested the striped wall inside the rectangular arena. We found that although chicks solely relied on geometry, rats navigated based on both environmental geometry and the featural cue. While our findings with rats are contrary to classic claims of an impervious geometric module, they are consistent with the hypothesis that navigation by boundaries and features may involve distinct underlying cognitive computations. We conclude by discussing the similarities and differences in feature-use across tasks and species.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChickensCuesMaleOrientationRatsSpace PerceptionSpatial MemorySpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32371918
PMCPMC7200675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.