ArticleHealth physics2020
Assessment of Eye Lens Dose Reduction When Using Lateral Lead Shields on the Patient's Head during Neurointerventional Fluoroscopic Procedures and Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Scans.
Article in Health physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- CBCTs in a Swiss university dental clinic: a retrospective evaluation over 5 years with emphasis on radiation protection criteria.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of placing small lead shields on the temple region of the skull to reduce radiation dose to the lens of the eye during interventional fluoroscopically-guided procedures and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the head. EGSnrc Monte-Carlo code was used to determine the eye lens dose reduction when using lateral lead shields for single x-ray projections, CBCT scans with different protocols, and interventional neuroradiology procedures with the Zubal computational head phantom. A clinical C-Arm system was used to take radiographic projections and CBCT scans of anthropomorphic head phantoms without and with lead patches, and the images were compared to assess the effect of the shields. For single lateral projections, a 0.1 (0.3)-mm-thick lead patch reduced the dose to the left-eye lens by 40% to 60% (55% to 80%) from 45° to 90° RAO and to the right-eye lens by around 30% (55%) from 70° to 90° RAO. For different CBCT protocols, the reduction of lens dose with a 0.3-mm-thick lead patch ranged from 20% to 53% at 110 kVp. For CBCT scans of the anthropomorphic phantom, the lead patch introduced streak artifacts that were mainly in the orbital regions but were insignificant in the brain region where most neurointerventional activity occurs. The dose to the patient's eye lens can be reduced considerably by placing small lead shields over the temple region of the head without substantially compromising image quality in neuro-imaging procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.