Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32371796›Full record

ArticleJournal of hypertension2020

Digital arterial pressure pulse wave analysis and cardiovascular events in the general population: the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease study.

Maarten A De Jong, Arie M Van Roon, Jens T Bakker, Hendrik T J Bijen, Douwe J Mulder, Frank P Brouwers, Wiek H Van Gilst, Adriaan A Voors, Ron T Gansevoort, Stephan J L Bakker and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maarten A De JongDivision of Nephrology.
Arie M Van RoonDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine.
Jens T BakkerDivision of Nephrology.
Hendrik T J BijenDivision of Nephrology.
Douwe J MulderDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine.
Frank P BrouwersDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen.
Wiek H Van GilstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen.
Adriaan A VoorsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen.
Ron T GansevoortDivision of Nephrology.
Stephan J L BakkerDivision of Nephrology.
Martin H De BorstDivision of Nephrology.
Center for Vascular Biology Research · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLTiFN · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArterial stiffness influences the contour of the digital pressure pulse wave.

methodHere, we investigated whether the digital pulse propagation index (DPPI), based on the digital pressure pulse wave, DPPI is associated with cardiovascular events, heart failure, and mortality in a large population-based cohort. Between 2001 and 2003, DPPI was measured with a PortaPres noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring device (FinaPres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) in participants of the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease study, a community-based cohort. We assessed the main determinants of the DPPI and investigated associations of DPPI with cardiovascular events and mortality.

resultsThe study included 5474 individuals. Mean age was 52.3 ± 11.8 years and 50.5% was male. Median baseline DPPI was 5.81 m/s (interquartile range 5.47-6.20). Higher age, mean arterial blood pressure, body height, heart rate, current smoking, and lower HDL cholesterol levels and waist circumference were independent determinants of the DPPI (r = 0.43). After adjustment for heart rate, highlogDPPI was associated with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio: 1.67, 95% confidence interval (1.55-1.81) per SD; P < 0.001], cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio 1.95 (1.72-2.22); P < 0.001], and incident heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [hazard ratio 1.81 (1.60-2.06); P < 0.001]. These associations remained independent upon further adjustment for confounders. Optimal cutoff values for DPPI ranged between 6.1 and 6.3 m/s for all endpoints. After multivariable adjustment, DPPI was no longer associated with coronary artery disease events or cerebrovascular events.

conclusionThe DPPI is associated with an increased risk of development of new onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, but not with coronary artery events or cerebrovascular events.

Indexed as

AdultArterial PressureCohort StudiesFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulse Wave Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32371796
PMCPMC7253183
OpenAlexW3006447510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.