Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32371571›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2020

Country adherence to WHO recommendations to improve the quality of HIV diagnosis: a global policy review.

Virginia A Fonner, Anita Sands, Carmen Figueroa, Rachel Baggaley, Caitlin Quinn, Muhammad S Jamil, Cheryl Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginia A FonnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA fonner@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9005-3549
Anita SandsDepartment of Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, Geneve, GE, Switzerland.
Carmen FigueroaGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.
Rachel BaggaleyGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.
Caitlin QuinnGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.
Muhammad S JamilGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.
Cheryl JohnsonGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnsuring a correct and timely HIV diagnosis is critical. WHO publishes guidelines on HIV testing strategies that maximise the likelihood of correctly determining one's HIV status. A review of national HIV testing policies in 2014 found low adherence to WHO guidelines. We updated this review to determine adherence to current recommendations.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive policy review through April 2018. We extracted data on HIV testing strategies, recommendations on HIV retesting prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-related HIV testing information. Descriptive analyses disaggregated by region were conducted to ascertain adherence to recommendations and to describe testing strategy characteristics.

resultsOf 91 policies included, 26% (n=24/91) adhered to WHO recommendations. Having a two-assay testing strategy to rule-in HIV infection as opposed to the recommended three-assay testing strategy was a major reason for non-adherence. Of 72 country policies providing sufficient information, 31% (n=22) recommended retesting for HIV prior to initiating ART. Of 25 countries and two regions reporting PrEP-related HIV testing guidelines, almost all recommended testing prior to initiating PrEP and every 3 months during PrEP use.

conclusionsGlobal adherence to WHO recommendations for HIV testing strategies have improved since 2014 but remain low. We found adherence existed on a continuum. Such a system provides insights into how countries can move towards adherence by making relatively minor changes to testing strategies. Guidance from WHO on the role of new HIV testing technologies within testing algorithms and identifying ways to simplify testing guidance is warranted.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisHumansPolicyWorld Health Organizationdiagnostics and toolshealth policyHIVscreening

Identifiers

PMID32371571
PMCPMC7228476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.