Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32371552›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

Changes in Colorectal Cancer 5-Year Survival Disparities in California, 1997-2014.

Debora L Oh, Eduardo J Santiago-Rodríguez, Alison J Canchola, Libby Ellis, Li Tao, Scarlett L Gomez

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Disentangling Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Treatment for Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Debora L OhDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Debora.Oh@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8229-5372
Eduardo J Santiago-RodríguezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8964-1255
Alison J CancholaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Libby EllisLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Li TaoGreater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Scarlett L GomezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Funding

Translational Epidemiology - Training for Research on Aging and Chronic diseaseT32AG049663 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Elizabeth Rose Mayeda, Mark J Pletcher · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS NU58DP006344NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032INIA NIH HHS T32 AG049663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer incidence and mortality have declined with increased screening and scientific advances in treatment. However, improvement in colorectal cancer outcomes has not been equal for all groups and disparities have persisted over time.

methodsData from the California Cancer Registry were used to estimate changes in 5-year colorectal cancer-specific survival over three diagnostic time periods: 1997-2002, 2003-2008, and 2009-2014. Analyses included all patients in California with colorectal cancer as a first primary malignancy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the effect of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) on 5-year colorectal cancer-specific survival.

resultsOn the basis of a population-based sample of 197,060 colorectal cancer cases, racial/ethnic survival disparities decreased over time among non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. For cases diagnosed 1997-2002, colorectal cancer-specific hazard rates were higher for NHB [HR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.19] and lower for Asians/Pacific Islanders (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96) and Hispanics (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99) compared with NHW. In 2009-2014, colorectal cancer-specific HR for NHB was not significantly different to the rate observed for NHW (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.10). There were no changes in disparities in nSES, but increasing disparities by health insurance status.

conclusionsWe found a decrease in survival disparities over time by race/ethnicity, but a persistence of disparities by neighborhood socioeconomic status and health insurance status. IMPACT: Further investigation into the drivers for these disparities can help direct policy and practice toward health equity for all groups.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32371552
PMCPMC7269803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.