ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2020
Statement on methods in sport injury research from the 1st METHODS MATTER Meeting, Copenhagen, 2019.
Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Tensiomyography, functional movement screen and counter movement jump for the assessment of injury risk in sport: a systematic review of original studies of diagnostic tests.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
- Call to increase statistical collaboration in sports science, sport and exercise medicine and sports physiotherapy.British journal of sports medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Visualizing youth sports specialization and injury risk: A novel application of swimmer plots.PloS one · 2026Article
- Competitive athletes' psychological and emotional experiences of injury rehabilitation: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Sports Injuries Among Athletes in the Lucknow Region: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopaedic clinical trials: a meta-research study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The Effect of Shoulder and Knee Exercise Programmes on the Risk of Shoulder and Knee Injuries in Adolescent Elite Handball Players: A Three-Armed Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Sports medicine - open · 2022Article
- Pharmacological Treatment for Acute Traumatic Musculoskeletal Pain in Athletes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Cross-sectional and prospective associations of sleep, sedentary and active behaviors with mental health in older people: a compositional data analysis from the Seniors-ENRICA-2 study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Article
- A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration.British journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Great Challenges Toward Sports Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High quality sports injury research can facilitate sports injury prevention and treatment. There is scope to improve how our field applies best practice methods-methods matter (greatly!). The 1st METHODS MATTER Meeting, held in January 2019 in Copenhagen, Denmark, was the forum for an international group of researchers with expertise in research methods to discuss sports injury methods. We discussed important epidemiological and statistical topics within the field of sports injury research. With this opinion document, we provide the main take-home messages that emerged from the meeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.