ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2020
RNA-Puzzles Round IV: 3D structure predictions of four ribozymes and two aptamers.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crosstalk between RNA secondary and three-dimensional structure prediction: a comprehensive study.RNA biology · 2026Article
- Nearest Neighbor Parameters for Estimating RNA Folding Stability withbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Open questions on viral frameshifting: Exploiting the structural plasticity of the frameshifting element for therapeutic intervention.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Spectral Graph Features for Reference-free RNA 3D Quality Assessment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- FRET-guided selection of RNA 3D structures.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Computational approaches for RNA structure prediction and design.Cell reports. Physical science · 2026Article
- Harnessing deep learning to accelerate the development of antibodies and aptamers.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- TiRNA: a coarse-grained method with temperature and ion effects for RNA structure folding and prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Decoding RNA triple helices: identification from sequence and secondary structure.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Assessment of Nucleic Acid Structure Prediction in CASP16.Proteins · 2026Article
- Structure Modeling Protocols for Protein Multimer and RNA in CASP16 With Enhanced MSAs, Model Ranking, and Deep Learning.Proteins · 2026Article
- The RNA-Puzzles Assessments of RNA-Only Targets in CASP16.Proteins · 2026Article
- Enhancing RNA 3D Structure Prediction in CASP16: Integrating Physics-Based Modeling With Machine Learning for Improved Predictions.Proteins · 2026Article
- PARSEbp: pairwise agreement-based RNA scoring with emphasis on base pairings.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in bioinformatics: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- PARSEbp: Pairwise Agreement-based RNA Scoring with Emphasis on Base Pairings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Can geometric combinatorics improve RNA branching predictions?BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- RNAbpFlow: Base pair-augmented SE(3)-flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- rsRNASP1: A distance- and dihedral-dependent statistical potential for RNA 3D structure evaluation.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-Puzzles is a collective endeavor dedicated to the advancement and improvement of RNA 3D structure prediction. With agreement from crystallographers, the RNA structures are predicted by various groups before the publication of the crystal structures. We now report the prediction of 3D structures for six RNA sequences: four nucleolytic ribozymes and two riboswitches. Systematic protocols for comparing models and crystal structures are described and analyzed. In these six puzzles, we discuss (i) the comparison between the automated web servers and human experts; (ii) the prediction of coaxial stacking; (iii) the prediction of structural details and ligand binding; (iv) the development of novel prediction methods; and (v) the potential improvements to be made. We show that correct prediction of coaxial stacking and tertiary contacts is essential for the prediction of RNA architecture, while ligand binding modes can only be predicted with low resolution and simultaneous prediction of RNA structure with accurate ligand binding still remains out of reach. All the predicted models are available for the future development of force field parameters and the improvement of comparison and assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.