Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32371452›Full record

SynthesisG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Meta-analysis of Diets Used in

Danielle N A Lesperance, Nichole A Broderick

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Age-Dependent Immune Defense AgainstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  8. Response of fruit fly (Physiological entomology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cuticular profiling of insecticide resistantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danielle N A LesperanceDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, and Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-5141
Nichole A BroderickDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, and Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 U.S.A nichole.broderick@uconn.edu danielle.andrzejewski@uconn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6830-9456

Funding

Non-genetic inheritance: mechanisms of microbiome-mediated transgenerational changeR35GM128871 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI BRODERICK, NICHOLE A · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition is a major factor influencing many aspects of

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDietDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterartificial dietsDrosophila melanogastergut microbiotahost-microbe interactionsnutritional analysis

Identifiers

PMID32371452
PMCPMC7341119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.