Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32371270›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2020

Racial/ethnic concordance between patients and researchers as a predictor of study attrition.

Irina Mindlis, David Livert, Alex D Federman, Juan P Wisnivesky, Tracey A Revenson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Fallacy of Community-Based Research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Methodological challenges and opportunities when studying the course of autism.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Perspective: Scientific Workforce Diversity and Its Impact on Aging Research.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irina MindlisPsychology Department, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: imindlis@gradcenter.cuny.edu.
David LivertPsychology Department, Penn State Lehigh Valley, PA, USA.
Alex D FedermanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA.
Juan P WisniveskyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA.
Tracey A RevensonPsychology Department, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, NY, USA; Psychology Department, Hunter College, City University of New York, NY, USA.
City University of New York · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono · US

Funding

Symptom perception, behavior, and outcomes in older asthmaticsR01HL131418 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FEDERMAN, ALEX D, FELDMAN, JONATHAN M. · 2016 to 2020
$4.2M
Self-management behaviors among COPD patients with multi-morbidityR01HL126508 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FEDERMAN, ALEX D, WISNIVESKY, JUAN P · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
Obesity and Asthma: Unveiling Metabolic and Behavioral PathwaysR01HL129198 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FEDERMAN, ALEX D, HOLGUIN, FERNANDO · 2016 to 2019
$3.2M
Longitudinal study of cognition, health literacy, and self-care in COPD patientsR01HL105385 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FEDERMAN, ALEX D, WISNIVESKY, JUAN P · 2011 to 2014
$3.0M
Seniors' health literacy, beliefs and asthma self-managementR01HL096612 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FEDERMAN, ALEX D · 2009 to 2012
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096612NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105385NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126508NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL129198NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe differential attrition of racial/ethnic minority participants in clinical research is a major threat to advancing medical and behavioral science.

objectiveOur aim was to examine the influence of racial/ethnic concordance between participants and research staff on study attrition.

methodData were pooled from participants and clinical research coordinators (CRCs) in six longitudinal studies of respiratory illness. Dyads were classified as concordant if the patient and CRC were of the same racial/ethnic group. Multilevel modeling examined the effect of racial/ethnic concordance on attrition at the first and one-year follow-ups.

resultsSpanish language, lower education, and greater depressive symptoms predicted greater attrition, but these effects disappeared in adjusted models. Race/ethnicity, age, gender and health literacy did not predict attrition. Contrary to hypotheses, attrition was greater among concordant than discordant dyads: Attrition was almost five times greater at first follow-up for Black and Hispanic participants in concordant dyads, and almost four times greater at one year.

conclusionsRacial/ethnic concordance between participant and CRCs was related to greater attrition in a highly diverse sample of adults with respiratory illness. Differential attrition of racial/ethnic minorities is a major threat to advancing public health. Interactions with research staff may be critical to bridging the disparities gap.

Indexed as

EthnicityMinority GroupsAdultBlack or African AmericanEducational StatusHispanic or LatinoHumansLanguage

Identifiers

PMID32371270
PMCPMC7289186
OpenAlexW3020518744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.