Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32370916›Full record

ArticleSurgery2020

Tumor-specific near-infrared nanobody probe rapidly labels tumors in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Thinzar M Lwin, Sophie Hernot, Hannah Hollandsworth, Siamak Amirfakhri, Filemoni Filemoni, Pieterjan Debie, Robert M Hoffman, Michael Bouvet

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanobodies: Robust miniprotein binders in biomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Nanobodies asRSC chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thinzar M LwinDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA.
Sophie HernotLaboratory for In vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging, ICMI-BEFY/MIMA, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Hannah HollandsworthDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA.
Siamak AmirfakhriDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA.
Filemoni FilemoniDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA.
Pieterjan DebieLaboratory for In vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging, ICMI-BEFY/MIMA, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Robert M HoffmanDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA; AntiCancer, Inc, San Diego, CA.
Michael BouvetDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA. Electronic address: mbouvet@ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
UCSD Cancer Center Training Program in Drug DevelopmentT32CA121938 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Michael Bouvet, Dwayne G. Stupack · 2006 to 2026
$10.3M
Color-Coded Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer Microenvironment for Drug DiscoveryR01CA132971 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOUVET, MICHAEL, YANG, MENG · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Imageable Mouse Models of Pancreatic CancerR33CA109949 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOUVET, MICHAEL · 2007 to 2008
$577k
Imageable Mouse Models of Pancreatic CancerR21CA109949 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI BOUVET, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2005
$341k
Development of Near Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Surgical Navigation and Tumor Specific Photoimmunotherapy for Improved Outcomes for GI CancersI01BX003856 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI BOUVET, MICHAEL · 2018 to 2022
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003856NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132971NCI NIH HHS R21 CA109949NCI NIH HHS R33 CA109949NCI NIH HHS T32 CA121938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNanobodies, derived from camelid antibodies made of only heavy chains, are the smallest, biologic, antigen-binding fragments (~15kDa) with faster pharmacokinetics and better tumor penetration efficiency than standard antibodies. The present study evaluates the efficacy of a fluorescent, anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) nanobody for rapid tumor labeling in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

methodsAnti-CEA or control nanobodies were conjugated with the near-infrared fluorophore IRDye 800CW. Fragments of BxPC-3 (high-CEA expressing) or MiaPACA-2 (low-CEA expressing) human pancreatic cancer cell lines were orthotopically implanted into the pancreatic tail of nude mice. After tumors reached 7 to 10 mm in size, 2 nmol anti-CEA or control nanobody-IRDye800CW were injected intravenously. Mice were imaged at various time points hours post-injection.

resultsAnti-CEA nanobodies clearly labeled BxPC3 orthotopic pancreatic tumors 3 hours after injection. The signal was present as early as 15 minutes after injection and was robust at 1 to 3 hours after injection with a tumor-to-background ratio of 2.66. In contrast, there was very low accumulation in the low CEA-expressing, MiaPACA2 pancreatic orthotopic tumors. The fluorophore-conjugated nanobody was specific for CEA-expressing tumors, while the control nanobody did not show any tumor-specific signal. Both nanobodies had strong kidney uptake as expected for small-molecule probes. The fluorescence signal was detectable using 2 clinical, Food and Drug Administration-approved, 800 nm imaging devices as well as small animal imaging systems.

conclusionThis anti-CEA, nanobody-based, fluorescent probe labeled pancreatic orthotopic tumors within 15 minutes of intravenous injection. Fluorescent anti-CEA nanobodies have labeling kinetics that approach the speed of nonspecific dyes such as indocyanine green but with the specificity of antibodies. The use of fluorescently-labeled, intact antibodies leads to a labeling delay of 48 to 96 hours between probe administration and the necessarily delayed time of operation, which can be avoided with nanobodies. The kinetics of a nanobody-based probe makes it a practical agent for same-day, patient administration and fluorescence-guided surgery.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesNeoplasms, ExperimentalPancreatic NeoplasmsSingle-Domain AntibodiesAnimalsFluorescent DyesSingle-Domain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID32370916
PMCPMC7311276
OpenAlexW3022313384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.