ArticleSurgery2020
Tumor-specific near-infrared nanobody probe rapidly labels tumors in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.
Article in Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumour-targeted fluorescence-guided surgery in gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review of preclinical and clinical research.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The diagnostic potential of nanobodies in acute myeloid leukemia.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- In vivo Fluorescent Molecular Imaging Using Nanobodies Labeled with Next-Generation FNIR-Tag-Dyes.Research square · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study on the Effect of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Dyes on the Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Nanobody-Based Tracers for In Vivo Imaging.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Codelivery of apigenin, FdUMP and CD276 antibody synergistic inhibit colorectal cancer by ferroptosis-apoptosis-pyroptosis and CD276 blockade.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Article
- Single-Domain Antibodies as Antibody-Drug Conjugates: From Promise to Practice-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Preclinical evaluation of EpCAM-binding designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) as targeting moieties for bimodal near-infrared fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging of cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Review
- Small Antibodies with Big Applications: Nanobody-Based Cancer Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Cancers · 2023Review
- Nanobodies: Robust miniprotein binders in biomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer Using a Fluorescently Labelled Anti-CEA Nanobody Probe: A Preclinical Study.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Safety assessment of fluorescently labeled anti-EGFR Nanobodies in healthy dogs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- The GEM-handle as convenient labeling strategy for bimodal single-domain antibody-based tracers carryingFrontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Fluorescent Anti-CEA Nanobody for Rapid Tumor-Targeting and Imaging in Mouse Models of Pancreatic Cancer.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Review
- Rapid tumor-labeling kinetics with a site-specific near-infrared anti-CEA nanobody in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of colon cancer.Journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Nanobodies asRSC chemical biology · 2021Review
- Review
- Nanobodies as Versatile Tool for Multiscale Imaging Modalities.Biomolecules · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNanobodies, derived from camelid antibodies made of only heavy chains, are the smallest, biologic, antigen-binding fragments (~15kDa) with faster pharmacokinetics and better tumor penetration efficiency than standard antibodies. The present study evaluates the efficacy of a fluorescent, anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) nanobody for rapid tumor labeling in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.
methodsAnti-CEA or control nanobodies were conjugated with the near-infrared fluorophore IRDye 800CW. Fragments of BxPC-3 (high-CEA expressing) or MiaPACA-2 (low-CEA expressing) human pancreatic cancer cell lines were orthotopically implanted into the pancreatic tail of nude mice. After tumors reached 7 to 10 mm in size, 2 nmol anti-CEA or control nanobody-IRDye800CW were injected intravenously. Mice were imaged at various time points hours post-injection.
resultsAnti-CEA nanobodies clearly labeled BxPC3 orthotopic pancreatic tumors 3 hours after injection. The signal was present as early as 15 minutes after injection and was robust at 1 to 3 hours after injection with a tumor-to-background ratio of 2.66. In contrast, there was very low accumulation in the low CEA-expressing, MiaPACA2 pancreatic orthotopic tumors. The fluorophore-conjugated nanobody was specific for CEA-expressing tumors, while the control nanobody did not show any tumor-specific signal. Both nanobodies had strong kidney uptake as expected for small-molecule probes. The fluorescence signal was detectable using 2 clinical, Food and Drug Administration-approved, 800 nm imaging devices as well as small animal imaging systems.
conclusionThis anti-CEA, nanobody-based, fluorescent probe labeled pancreatic orthotopic tumors within 15 minutes of intravenous injection. Fluorescent anti-CEA nanobodies have labeling kinetics that approach the speed of nonspecific dyes such as indocyanine green but with the specificity of antibodies. The use of fluorescently-labeled, intact antibodies leads to a labeling delay of 48 to 96 hours between probe administration and the necessarily delayed time of operation, which can be avoided with nanobodies. The kinetics of a nanobody-based probe makes it a practical agent for same-day, patient administration and fluorescence-guided surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.