ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
High Potential of Bacterial Adhesion on Block Bone Graft Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioceramic bone tissue-engineered substitutes with anti-inflammatory effects in periodontitis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Early Radiological Limitations in Bone Healing Estimation After Allogeneic Bone Grafts Used for Mandible Reconstruction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Customized Bone Regeneration-A Retrospective Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Aesthetic Outcome.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Bacterial colonization of bone substitute materials used in oral surgery: mechanisms, clinical implications, and preventive strategies-A narrative review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Strontium- and Copper-Doped Ceramic Granules in Bone Regeneration-Associated Cellular Processes.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Traumatic Fracture Treatment: Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Case-Control Study in Humerus, Radius, Tibia Fractures-Assessing Efficacy and Recovery Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Role of periosteum during healing of alveolar critical size bone defects in the mandible: a pilot study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Bioengineering Approaches to Fight against Orthopedic Biomaterials Related-Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Bio-Interactive Zwitterionic Dental Biomaterials for Improving Biofilm Resistance: Characteristics and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone graft infections represent a challenge in daily clinics, resulting in increased patient discomfort and graft removal. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial adhesion of five representative pathogens on three different block bone graft materials (xenogeneic, alloplastic and allogeneic) and to assess if chlorhexidine (CHX) can effectively control the initial bacterial adhesion. Three different block bone grafting materials (Tutobone®, Endobon® and human spongiosa) were incubated with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.