Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32369914›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2020

OCTAVVS: A Graphical Toolbox for High-Throughput Preprocessing and Analysis of Vibrational Spectroscopy Imaging Data.

Carl Troein, Syahril Siregar, Michiel Op De Beeck, Carsten Peterson, Anders Tunlid, Per Persson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carl TroeinDepartment of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9729-8891
Syahril SiregarDepartment of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8041-8575
Michiel Op De BeeckDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Carsten PetersonDepartment of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Anders TunlidDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Per PerssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9172-3068

Funding

Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning 17:475Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse 2013:0073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern vibrational spectroscopy techniques enable the rapid collection of thousands of spectra in a single hyperspectral image, allowing researchers to study spatially heterogeneous samples at micrometer resolution. A number of algorithms have been developed to correct for effects such as atmospheric absorption, light scattering by cellular structures and varying baseline levels. After preprocessing, spectra are commonly decomposed and clustered to reveal informative patterns and subtle spectral changes. Several of these steps are slow, labor-intensive and require programming skills to make use of published algorithms and code. We here present a free and platform-independent graphical toolbox that allows rapid preprocessing of large sets of spectroscopic images, including atmospheric correction and a new algorithm for resonant Mie scattering with improved speed. The software also includes modules for decomposition into constituent spectra using the popular Multivariate Curve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS) algorithm, augmented by region-of-interest selection, as well as clustering and cluster annotation.

Indexed as

atmospheric correctionhyperspectralinfrared spectroscopyMCR-ALSMie scattering correction

Identifiers

PMID32369914
PMCPMC7359710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.