Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32369488›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Association of preeclampsia with anthropometric measures and blood pressure in Indian children.

Karuna Randhir, Hemlata Pisal, Vrushali Kadam, Amrita Khaire-Ghadge, Nandini Malshe, Ruma Deshpande, Sonali Palkar, Sanjay Lalwani, Kalyanaraman Kumaran, Chittaranjan Yajnik and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karuna RandhirMother and Child Health, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Hemlata PisalMother and Child Health, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Vrushali KadamMother and Child Health, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Amrita Khaire-GhadgeMother and Child Health, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Nandini MalsheDept. of Pediatrics, Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Ruma DeshpandeDept. of Pediatrics, Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Sonali PalkarDept. of Pediatrics, Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Sanjay LalwaniDept. of Pediatrics, Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.
Kalyanaraman KumaranMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Chittaranjan YajnikDiabetes Unit of KEM Hospital and Research Centre, Rasta Peth, Pune, India.
Clive OsmondMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Caroline FallMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Sadhana JoshiMother and Child Health, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Katraj, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0551-7183
Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBDr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400519Medical Research Council MC_U147585821Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1016Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/3Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098575/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveBirth weight and post-natal growth are important predictors of adult health. Preeclampsia (PE) is associated with low birth weight and may have long term effects on the health of the children. The current study aims to compare anthropometry and blood pressure between children of mothers with and without PE in an Indian cohort.

methodsWe studied children born to women with (PE; n = 211) and without preeclampsia (non-PE; n = 470) at Bharati Hospital, Pune, India. Anthropometry and blood pressure were measured in children at 3-7 years of age. Weight and height Z-scores were calculated using the WHO 2006 growth reference. Independent t-tests were used to compare means between the two groups, and associations between preeclampsia and child outcomes were analyzed using multiple linear regression, adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsWeight and height Z-scores (p = 0.04 and 0.008), and subscapular skinfold thickness (p = 0.03) were higher among children of PE compared with children of non-PE mothers. Systolic blood pressure was also higher in children of PE mothers (1.70 mmHg [95% CI 0.05, 2.90] p = 0.006). BMI and diastolic blood pressure did not differ between groups. In regression models adjusted for newborn weight and gestational age, current age and sex, and maternal height, BMI and socio-economic status, children of PE mothers had higher weight Z-score (0.27 SD [95%CI 0.06, 0.48] p = 0.01), height Z-score (0.28 SD [95%CI 0.09, 0.47] p = 0.005), and subscapular skinfold thickness (0.38 mm [95%CI 0.00, 0.76] p = 0.049). A trend for higher systolic blood pressure (1.59 mmHg [95%CI -0.02, 3.20] p = 0.053) in the children was also observed in the adjusted model. The difference in systolic blood pressure was attenuated after adjusting further for the child's weight and height (1.09 mmHg [95%CI -0.48, 2.67] p = 0.17). There was no evidence of differences in effects between boys and girls.

conclusionChildren of PE mothers were taller and heavier, and had higher systolic blood pressure, partly explained by their increased body size, than children of non-PE mothers. In utero exposure to preeclampsia may increase the risk of future cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBlood PressureBody HeightBlood Pressure DeterminationBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMaternal AgePre-EclampsiaPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed Effects

Identifiers

PMID32369488
PMCPMC7199948
OpenAlexW3022940011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.