ArticleAJOB empirical bioethics
"We're Not Ready, But I Don't Think You're Ever Ready." Clinician Perspectives on Implementation of Crisis Standards of Care.
Article in AJOB empirical bioethics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- When ethics is not enough: institutional governance of critical care allocation under crisis conditions.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Covert Triage During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis of Rationing in Intensive Care.Chest · 2025Article
- Large-Scale Combat Operation Education and Training Needs: Implications for Military and Civilian Medical Education.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Inter-hospital Transfer Decision-making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- COVID-19 crisis management of German ICU clinicians in leadership - a metaphor analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Ethical preparedness in health research and care: the role of behavioural approaches.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Critical care nurses' perception of moral distress in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic - A pilot study.Intensive & critical care nursing · 2022Article
- Public Health and Health Sector Crisis Leadership During Pandemics: A Review of the Medical and Business Literature.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2022Review
- Experiences of physiotherapists involved in front-line management of patients with COVID-19 in Nigeria: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Perspectives of Triage Team Members Participating in Statewide Triage Simulations for Scarce Resource Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Washington State.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Functionality of Scarce Healthcare Resource Triage Teams During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Institutional Simulation Study.Critical care explorations · 2022Article
- The Ethical Unjustifications of COVID-19 Triage Committees.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2021Article
- Intensive care unit nurses living through COVID-19: A qualitative study.Journal of nursing management · 2021Article
- Assembly Line ICU: what the Long Shops taught us about managing surge capacity for COVID-19.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
- Does COVID-19 really call for an overhaul of nursing curricula or promoting the power, status, and representation of nursing?Journal of advanced nursing · 2020Article
- Article
- Predictors of failure of high flow nasal cannula failure in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.Respiratory medicineObservational
- COVID-19: Advancing Empirical Bioethics Research.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.