Observational studyESC heart failure2020
Introduction of sacubitril/valsartan in primary care follow-up of heart failure: a prospective observational study (THESEUS).
Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart failure epidemiology and treatment in primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional study.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Introduction of sacubitril/valsartan in primary care follow-up of heart failure: a prospective observational study (THESEUS).ESC heart failure · 2020Observational
- Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Enalapril: A Real-World, Population-Based Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsSwitch from angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment to sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) is associated with benefit in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Reports on management of this switch are largely based on randomized controlled trials, retrospective analyses, and hospital-based care, while patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are frequently followed-up in primary care. The THESEUS study aimed to characterize the transition to sac/val and early maintenance period of HFrEF in primary care. METHOD AND
resultsTHESEUS was a prospective, observational, non-interventional study, performed at primary care sites throughout Switzerland. Patient characteristics, sac/val transition, and maintenance were reported at study enrolment and approximately 3 and 6 months after sac/val initiation. The primary endpoint was achievement of 200 mg BID sac/val with maintenance for ≥12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included dosing regimens, healthcare utilization in the 6 months prior to sac/val initiation and during the study, patient well-being, safety, and tolerability. Fifty-eight patients with CHF were enrolled from 45 primary care centres. Six patients were excluded, and 19 achieved the primary endpoint (36.5%, Achievers). Non-Achievers underwent fewer titration steps than Achievers (1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.1 ± 1.4). In both groups, patient well-being improved and the percentage of New York Heart Association III patients decreased. Healthcare utilization decreased (19% vs. 30.8% in the 6 months pre-enrolment period). The most frequent reasons for target dose non-achievement were asymptomatic and symptomatic hypotension (15.3% and 12.1%, respectively).
conclusionsResults from THESEUS suggest that transition to sac/val is manageable in primary care, with a safety profile corresponding to reports from specialized heart failure care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.