Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32369180›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Developmental Outcomes Among Young Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil.

Anne C Wheeler, Danielle Toth, Ty Ridenour, Lucélia Lima Nóbrega, Raíne Borba Firmino, Claudia Marques da Silva, Pollyanna Carvalho, Douglas Marques, Katherine Okoniewski, Liana O Ventura and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Flaviviruses-Induced Neurological Sequelae.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne C WheelerCenter for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Danielle TothCenter for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Ty RidenourCenter for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Lucélia Lima NóbregaRehabilitation Center Menina dos Olhos, Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Raíne Borba FirminoRehabilitation Center Menina dos Olhos, Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Claudia Marques da SilvaRehabilitation Center Menina dos Olhos, Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Pollyanna CarvalhoRehabilitation Center Menina dos Olhos, Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Douglas MarquesRehabilitation Center Menina dos Olhos, Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Katherine OkoniewskiCenter for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Liana O VenturaRehabilitation Center Menina dos Olhos, Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Donald B BaileyCenter for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Camila V VenturaRehabilitation Center Menina dos Olhos, Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Fundação Altino Ventura · BRRTI International · US

Funding

Child and Family Consequences of Congenital Zika Syndrome in BrazilR01HD093572 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI BAILEY, DONALD B, VENTURA, CAMILA · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Clinical progression and predictors of outcomes in congenital Zika syndromeR01HD112407 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI CAMILA VENTURA, Anne Caroline Wheeler · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093572NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD112407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although birth defects in children with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) are expected to result in significant intellectual disabilities, the extent of delay and profiles of development have yet to be fully described. Objectives: To describe the neurodevelopmental profiles of children with CZS and to test whether prenatal and postpartum characteristics were associated with the severity of developmental delays. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a case series of the trajectories of developmental, behavioral, and medical needs of 121 young children with CZS who were assessed at a specialized rehabilitation center in Recife, Brazil, beginning in January 2018 as part of 5-year longitudinal study. Children were included if they had serologic confirmation of Zika virus and met clinical criteria accompanied by parental report of suspected exposure to Zika virus during pregnancy. Exposures: Prenatal Zika virus exposure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The Brazilian version of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition, was administered by trained assessors as part of an initial comprehensive assessment battery. Caregiver interviews and medical record reviews were conducted to gather basic demographic information and medical comorbidities. Linear regression was used to identify potential factors for development. Results: The sample included 121 young children (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [1.9] months; 61 [50.4%] girls). At age approximately 2.5 years, nearly all children in this sample demonstrated profound developmental delays across all domains of functioning, with a mean (SD) developmental age equivalent to approximately 2 to 4 months (eg, cognitive domain, 2.24 [3.09] months; fine motor subscale, 2.15 [2.93] months; expressive language subscale, 2.30 [2.52] months). A relative strength was found in receptive language, with scores on this scale significantly higher than most other domains (eg, cognition: t = 3.73; P < .001; fine motor: t = 6.99; P < .001). Head circumference at birth was the single strongest factor associated with outcomes across all developmental domains (eg, cognitive: β = 1.41; SE, 0.67; P = .04; fine motor: β = 1.36; SE, 0.49; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study provide important information regarding the severity of disability that these children and their families will experience. The findings also establish an initial point from which to monitor developmental trajectories, medical comorbidities (eg, seizures), effectiveness of interventions, and cumulative consequences on families.

Indexed as

BrazilChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMicrocephalyPregnancyZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID32369180
PMCPMC7201309
OpenAlexW3020922568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.