Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368934›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2020

Perceptions of HIV Virologic Control Strategies Among Younger and Older Age Groups of People Living with HIV in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Parya Saberi, Shadi Eskaf, John Sauceda, David Evans, Karine Dubé

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Time to Engage Young People in HIV Cure Research.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Parya SaberiDivision of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Shadi EskafDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, UNC School of Government, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
John SaucedaDivision of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
David EvansDelaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Karine DubéUNC Gillings School of Global Public Health Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
San Francisco AIDS Foundation · USDelaney AIDS Research Enterprise · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

Pilot Integration of Participant-Centered Outcomes in HIV Cure Research in the United States: Implications for Ethical ConductR21MH118120 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DUBE, KARINE · 2019 to 2020
$566k
Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of Participating in HIV Cure-related Research among Diverse Youth and Young Adults Living with HIV in the United StatesR21MH122280 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DUBE, KARINE, SABERI, PARYA · 2020 to 2021
$458k
Rx Pix: A Novel Way to Assess Antiretroviral Adherence with Pharmacy Refill DatesR21MH108414 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SABERI, PARYA · 2016 to 2017
$436k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH108414NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH118120NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH122280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two HIV virologic control advances are in various stages of development, including long-acting antiretroviral therapy (ART) formulations and strategies aimed at sustained ART-free HIV control. Perceptions of risks and benefits toward HIV virologic control strategies may be different based on an individual's age due to differing experiences of the impacts of the domestic HIV epidemic, altruistic attitudes toward research participation, and general levels of engagement in health care. We examined preferences of HIV virologic control strategies by age groups. In 2018, we conducted a nationwide, online cross-sectional survey to examine differences in HIV virologic control strategies among a sample of people living with HIV who were <50 and ≥50 years of age. From a total of 281 participants, 3 findings were noteworthy: (1) Participants <50 years of age were more likely to be demotivated by perceived social risks (e.g., stigma, discrimination, HIV disclosure, and fear of transmitting HIV during a treatment interruption), compared with those ≥50 years; (2) participants ≥50 years of age were more motivated by altruistic notions compared with those <50 years; and (3) we noted greater desirability of longer long-acting ART and new HIV cure-related strategies among participants <50 years versus those ≥50 years. Our analysis provides a deeper understanding of differences in perceptions among various age groups regarding desirable future ART characteristics, and motivations and barriers to participating in HIV cure-related strategies. Our findings can help inform community engagement and education, and assist researchers in tailoring study design and recruitment efforts to major age groups.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAdultAgedAltruismAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV Agentsage categoriesHIV cure-related researchHIV virologic control strategieslong-acting antiretroviral therapyperceptions and attitudessocio-behavioral research

Identifiers

PMID32368934
PMCPMC7398435
OpenAlexW3021897030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.