Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368865›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2020

The neonatal Fc receptor in cancer FcRn in cancer.

Diana Cadena Castaneda, Guillaume Brachet, Caroline Goupille, Lobna Ouldamer, Valérie Gouilleux-Gruart

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Non-specific irreversibleEJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. In Translation: FcRn across the Therapeutic Spectrum.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana Cadena CastanedaUniversité de Tours, Tours, France.
Guillaume BrachetUniversité de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5256-1868
Caroline GoupilleCHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Lobna OuldamerCHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Valérie Gouilleux-GruartUniversité de Tours, Tours, France.
Université de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the neonatal IgG Fc receptor (FcRn) was discovered, it was found to be involved in immunoglobulin recycling and biodistribution, immune complexes routing, antigen presentation, humoral immune response, and cancer immunosurveillance. The latest data show that FcRn plays a part in cancer pathophysiology. In various types of cancers, such as lung and colorectal cancer, FcRn has been described as an early marker for prognosis. Dysregulation of FcRn expression by cancer cells allows them to increase their metabolism, and this process could be exploited for passive targeting of cytotoxic drugs. However, the roles of this receptor depend on whether the studied cell population is the tumor tissue or the infiltrating cells, bringing forward the need for further studies.

Indexed as

Monitoring, ImmunologicAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisDown-RegulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansKiller Cells, NaturalMiceNeoplasmsPrognosisReceptors, FcBiomarkers, TumorFc receptor, neonatalHistocompatibility Antigens Class IReceptors, Fcantigen presentationcancercancer prognosiscross-presentationFCGRTimmune complexesimmunosurveillanceNeonatal Fc receptortumor metabolism

Identifiers

PMID32368865
PMCPMC7333860
OpenAlexW3023499671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.