Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368860›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2020

Effect of low-thermal dissection device versus conventional electrocautery in mastectomy for female-to-male transgender patients.

Torsten Schlosshauer, Marcus Kiehlmann, Marc-Oliver Riener, Jens Rothenberger, Robert Sader, Ulrich M Rieger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Torsten SchlosshauerDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Marcus KiehlmannDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Marc-Oliver RienerOptiPath, Institute of Pathology, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jens RothenbergerDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Robert SaderDepartment for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ulrich M RiegerDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Agaplesion Markus Hospital · DEEvonik (Germany) · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subcutaneous mastectomy, the first step in sexual reassignment surgery of female-to-male transsexuals, is associated with high rates of complication and revision surgery. Also, conventional electrosurgery and the associated thermal tissue damage may compromise outcome. This retrospective randomised clinical study evaluated the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) in comparison with conventional electrosurgery. A total of 17 female-to-male transsexuals undergoing mastectomy were randomised to PEAK PlasmaBlade on one breast side and to monopolar electrosurgery on the other side of the same patient. Wounds of 17 patients were examined histologically for acute thermal injury. Significantly less total volume of drain output (58.8 ± 37.4 mL vs 98.5 ± 76.4 mL; P = .012) was found on the PEAK PlasmaBlade side compared with the electrosurgery side. Duration of drain was significantly shorter on the PEAK PlasmaBlade side (2.5 ± 0.7 days vs 3.2 ± 0.6 days; P = .010). Furthermore, the PEAK PlasmaBlade side showed fewer thermal damages (41.2% vs 82.4%; P = .039) and thermal injury depth from PEAK PlasmaBlade side was less (3170 vs 4060 μm). PEAK PlasmaBlade appears to be superior to monopolar electrosurgery for mastectomy in female-to-male transsexuals, because it demonstrated less thermal tissue damage, less total volume of drain output, and shorter duration of drain, resulting in faster wound healing.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTransgender PersonsDissectionElectrocoagulationElectrosurgeryFemaleHumansMaleMastectomyRetrospective Studiesdrain outputduration of drainelectrosurgerymastectomyPEAK PlasmaBladetranssexuals

Identifiers

PMID32368860
PMCPMC7949210
OpenAlexW3022212529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.