Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368782›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Mutation Carriers with Reduced C-Afferent Density Reveal Cortical Dynamics of Pain-Action Relationship during Acute Pain.

I Perini, M Ceko, L Cerliani, H van Ettinger-Veenstra, J Minde, I Morrison

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  2. Prediction and action in cortical pain processing.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

I PeriniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.
M CekoInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
L CerlianiBrain Connectivity and Behaviour Group, Frontlab, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), UMRS 975, 75013 Paris, France.
H van Ettinger-VeenstraDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.
J MindeDepartment of Surgery, Unit of Orthopedics, Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå S-901 85, Sweden.
I MorrisonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEUmeå University · SEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evidence that action shapes perception has become widely accepted, for example, in the domain of vision. However, the manner in which action-relevant factors might influence the neural dynamics of acute pain processing has remained underexplored, particularly the functional roles of anterior insula (AI) and midanterior cingulate cortex (mid-ACC), which are frequently implicated in acute pain. To address this, we examined a unique group of heterozygous carriers of the rare R221W mutation on the nerve growth factor (NGF) gene. R221W carriers show a congenitally reduced density of C-nociceptor afferent nerves in the periphery, but can nonetheless distinguish between painful and nonpainful stimulations. Despite this, carriers display a tendency to underreact to acute pain behaviorally, thus exposing a potential functional gap in the pain-action relationship and allowing closer investigation of how the brain integrates pain and action information. Heterozygous R221W carriers and matched controls performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task designed to dissociate stimulus type (painful or innocuous) from current behavioral relevance (relevant or irrelevant), by instructing participants to either press or refrain from pressing a button during thermal stimulation. Carriers' subjective pain thresholds did not differ from controls', but the carrier group showed decreased task accuracy. Hemodynamic activation in AI covaried with task performance, revealing a functional role in pain-action integration with increased responses for task-relevant painful stimulation ("signal," requiring button-press execution) over task-irrelevant stimulation ("noise," requiring button-press suppression). As predicted, mid-ACC activation was associated with action execution regardless of pain. Functional connectivity between AI and mid-ACC increased as a function of reported urge to withdraw from the stimulus, suggesting a joint role for these regions in motivated action during pain. The carrier group showed greater activation of primary sensorimotor cortices-but not the AI and mid-ACC regions-during pain and action, suggesting compensatory processing. These findings indicate a critical role for the AI-mid-ACC axis in supporting a flexible, adaptive action selection during pain, alongside the accompanying subjective experience of an urge to escape the pain.

Indexed as

Acute PainAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHeterozygoteHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor ActivityMutationNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNerve Growth FactorPain PerceptionNerve Growth Factoractionanterior cingulate cortexanterior insulapainR221W mutation

Identifiers

PMID32368782
PMCPMC7391276
OpenAlexW3023477929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.