Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368707›Full record

ArticleTranslational medicine of aging2018

Translational Geroscience: From invertebrate models to companion animal and human interventions.

Mitchell B Lee, Matt Kaeberlein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational medicine of aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. New Directions in Research on Aging.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Antiaging diets: Separating fact from fiction.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitchell B LeeDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Matt KaeberleinDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF OXYGEN DNA DAMAGE AND MUTAGENESISP01AG001751 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PRUSKY, GLEN THOMAS · 1985 to 2021
$29.6M
University of Washington Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of AgingP30AG013280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Michael MacCoss · 1995 to 2026
$27.1M
TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG001751NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013280NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translational geroscience is an interdisciplinary field descended from basic gerontology that seeks to identify, validate, and clinically apply interventions to maximize healthy, disease-free lifespan. In this review, we describe a research pipeline for the identification and validation of lifespan extending interventions. Beginning in invertebrate model systems, interventions are discovered and then characterized using other invertebrate model systems (evolutionary translation), models of genetic diversity, and disease models. Vertebrate model systems, particularly mice, can then be utilized to validate interventions in mammalian systems. Collaborative, multi-site efforts, like the Interventions Testing Program (ITP), provide a key resource to assess intervention robustness in genetically diverse mice. Mouse disease models provide a tool to understand the broader utility of longevity interventions. Beyond mouse models, we advocate for studies in companion pets. The Dog Aging Project is an exciting example of translating research in dogs, both to develop a model system and to extend their healthy lifespan as a goal in itself. Finally, we discuss proposed and ongoing intervention studies in humans, unmet needs for validating interventions in humans, and speculate on how differences in survival among human populations may influence intervention efficacy.

Indexed as

agingcompanion animalshealthspanlongevitymetforminmTORrapamycinTranslational geroscience

Identifiers

PMID32368707
PMCPMC7198054
OpenAlexW2886624647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.