Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368623›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2020

Long-term patient-reported distress in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation.

Jessica L Conway, Shira Felder, Jiayin Tang, Jelena Lukovic, Kathy Han, Zhihui Liu, Michael Milosevic, Anthony Fyles, Jennifer Croke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L ConwayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shira FelderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jiayin TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jelena LukovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kathy HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zhihui LiuUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada.
Michael MilosevicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anthony FylesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer CrokeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo evaluate longitudinal patient-reported distress in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT). MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween 2011 and 2016, consenting cervical cancer patients treated with definitive CRT who completed ≥ 2 revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) questionnaires at clinical visits, including baseline, were included. A linear mixed model was used to assess the longitudinal trend in ESAS-r. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for total ESAS-r score was defined as a change of 3-points for improvement and 4-points for deterioration. The proportion of patients with an MCID over time was described using moving averages. To test for changes, mixed effects logistic models were fitted, each of which included patient-specific random intercepts and random slopes.

results67 patients were eligible for analysis (736 ESAS-r assessments). Median (range) follow-up was 24 months (range: 15-45) and compliance at 12 months was 60% (40/67). There was a significant decrease in ESAS-r scores over time. Baseline ESAS-r was strongly predictive of ESAS-r at follow-up (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with an MCID for improvement from baseline significantly increased over time (p < 0.001) and the proportion with an MCID for deterioration significantly decreased over time (p < 0.001). No predictors for distress were found.

conclusionsLong-term cervical cancer survivors experience distress that significantly improves over time to an extent expected to be clinically meaningful for patients. Implementing cervical cancer specific patient-reported outcome tools into practice could better inform patient needs.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyCervical cancerDistressPatient-reported outcomesSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID32368623
PMCPMC7186264
OpenAlexW3017220524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.