ReviewGlobal health research and policy2020
Developing a framework to inform scale-up success for population health interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.
Review in Global health research and policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review and systems thinking synthesis of scale-up frameworks.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- How is health equity considered in scale-up guidance? A scoping review of process models for scaling public health innovations.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Expériences et perceptions de la mise à l'échelle d'une intervention de santé publique: entretiens auprès d'une variété d'acteurs français.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Implementation and knowledge translation of health promotion programs at scale: "a perspective article".Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Synthesis of conceptual, methodological and pedagogical works on scaling up complex public health interventions: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Addressing health equity during design and implementation of health system reform initiatives: a scoping review and framework.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Scaling up structured lifestyle interventions to improve the management of cardiometabolic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of strategies, methods and outcomes.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- A quality improvement approach to scaling up a complex health system intervention for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in rural Indonesia.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Advancing scaling science in health and social care: a scoping review and appraisal of scaling frameworks.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study.Health research policy and systems · 2024Review
- Development of a Framework for Scaling Up Community-Based Health Promotion: A Best Fit Framework Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Scaling Up a Community-Based Exercise Program for Women in Difficult Life Situations in Germany-The BIG Project as a Case-Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Readiness for scale-up: lessons learned from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Article
- Correction to: Developing a framework to inform scale-up success for population health interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.Global health research and policy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Population health interventions (PHIs) have the potential to improve the health of large populations by systematically addressing underlying conditions of poor health outcomes (i.e., social determinants of health) and reducing health inequities. Scaling-up may be one means of enhancing the impact of effective PHIs. However, not all scale-up attempts have been successful. In an attempt to help guide the process of successful scale-up of a PHI, we look to the organizational readiness for change theory for a new perspective on how we may better understand the scale-up pathway. Using the change theory, our goal was to develop the foundations of an evidence-based, theory-informed framework for a PHI, through a critical examination of various PHI scale-up experiences documented in the literature. Methods: We conducted a multi-step, critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) to gather and examine insights from scale-up experiences detailed in peer-reviewed and grey literatures, with a focus on PHIs from a variety of global settings. The CIS included iterative cycles of systematic searching, sampling, data extraction, critiquing, interpreting, coding, reflecting, and synthesizing. Theories relevant to innovations, complexity, and organizational readiness guided our analysis and synthesis. Results: We retained and examined twenty different PHI scale-up experiences, which were extracted from 77 documents (47 peer-reviewed, 30 grey literature) published between 1995 and 2013. Overall, we identified three phases (i.e., Groundwork, Implementing Scale-up, and Sustaining Scale-up), 11 actions, and four key components (i.e., PHI, context, capacity, stakeholders) pertinent to the scale-up process. Our guiding theories provided explanatory power to various aspects of the scale-up process and to scale-up success, and an alternative perspective to the assessment of scale-up readiness for a PHI. Conclusion: Our synthesis provided the foundations of the Scale-up Readiness Assessment Framework. Our theoretically-informed and rigorous synthesis methodology permitted identification of disparate processes involved in the successful scale-up of a PHI. Our findings complement the guidance and resources currently available, and offer an added perspective to assessing scale-up readiness for a PHI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.