Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368524›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2020

Effects of real-time electronic data entry on HIV programme data quality in Lusaka, Zambia.

K Moomba, A Williams, T Savory, M Lumpa, P Chilembo, H Tweya, A D Harries, M Herce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K MoombaCentre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
A WilliamsOperational Centre Brussels, Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières - Operational Research Unit (LuxOR), MSF Luxembourg.
T SavoryCentre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
M LumpaCentre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
P ChilemboCentre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
H TweyaThe Lighthouse Clinic, Lilongwe, Malawi.
A D HarriesInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.
M HerceCentre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinics in five hospitals and five health centres in Lusaka, Zambia, which transitioned from daily entry of paper-based data records to an electronic medical record (EMR) system by dedicated data staff (Electronic-Last) to direct real-time data entry into the EMR by frontline health workers (Electronic-First).

objectiveTo compare completeness and accuracy of key HIV-related variables before and after transition of data entry from Electronic-Last to Electronic-First.

designComparative cross-sectional study using existing secondary data.

resultsRegistration data (e.g., date of birth) was 100% complete and pharmacy data (e.g., antiretroviral therapy regimen) was <90% complete under both approaches. Completeness of anthropometric and vital sign data was <75% across all facilities under Electronic-Last, and this worsened after Electronic-First. Completeness of TB screening and World Health Organization clinical staging data was also <75%, but improved with Electronic-First. Data entry errors for registration and clinical consultations decreased under Electronic-First, but errors increased for all anthropometric and vital sign variables. Patterns were similar in hospitals and health centres.

conclusionWith the notable exception of clinical consultation data, data completeness and accuracy did not improve after transitioning from Electronic-Last to Electronic-First. For anthropometric and vital sign variables, completeness and accuracy decreased. Quality improvement interventions are needed to improve Electronic-First implementation.

Indexed as

anthropometrydata qualityEMRHIVSORT IT

Identifiers

PMID32368524
PMCPMC7181358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.