Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368438›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

Community health advisors assessing adherence to national cancer screening guidelines among African Americans in South Los Angeles.

Annette E Maxwell, Aziza Lucas-Wright, Juana Gatson, Claudia Vargas, Rhonda E Santifer, L Cindy Chang, Khoa Tran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annette E MaxwellCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA.
Aziza Lucas-WrightDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA.
Juana GatsonDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA.
Claudia VargasDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA.
Rhonda E SantiferDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA.
L Cindy ChangCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA.
Khoa TranCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA.

Funding

Supporting African American Churches to Promote Cancer ScreeningU54CA143931 · NCI · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI VADGAMA, JAYDUTT V. · 2009 to 2022
$19.7M
Training and Mentoring ProgramsU54CA143930 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PIETRAS, RICHARD JOSEPH · 2009 to 2020
$7.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143930NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We partnered with African American churches in South Los Angeles (LA) and trained Community Health Advisors (CHAs) to assess cancer screening. The purpose of this analysis is to report adherence to national cancer screening guidelines among African Americans in South LA, to assess relationships between adherence to colorectal cancer and other cancer screening guidelines, and to explore regional differences in screening rates. Between 2016 and 2018, 44 CHAs surveyed 777 African Americans between 50 and 75 years of age. Among 420 South LA residents, 64% of men and 70% of women were adherent to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Adherence to mammography screening guidelines was 73%. Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines among women 50 to 65 years of age without hysterectomy was 80%. Fifty-nine percent of men had ever discussed the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test with a physician. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines was significantly higher among respondents who were adherent to other cancer screening guidelines compared to their peers who were not adherent to other cancer screening guidelines (all p < 0.05). The fact that 22% of women who were adherent to breast cancer screening, 32% of women adherent to cervical cancer screening and 16% of men who had discussed the PSA test with a physician were

Indexed as

Adherence to cancer screening guidelinesAfrican American Community Health AdvisorsCollaboration with health ministriesCommunity surveySouth Los Angeles

Identifiers

PMID32368438
PMCPMC7190749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.