Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368235›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2020

The progress in outcomes of the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction between 2005 and 2014 in Poland - a propensity score matching analysis from the PL-ACS registry.

Łukasz Piątek, Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska, Karolina Piątek, Łukasz Zandecki, Jacek Kurzawski, Mariusz Gąsior, Marcin Sadowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Łukasz PiątekThe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska2 Department of Cardiology, Świętokrzyskie Cardiology Centre, Kielce, Poland.
Karolina Piątek2 Department of Cardiology, Świętokrzyskie Cardiology Centre, Kielce, Poland.
Łukasz ZandeckiThe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Jacek Kurzawski2 Department of Cardiology, Świętokrzyskie Cardiology Centre, Kielce, Poland.
Mariusz Gąsior3 Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Zabrze, Poland.
Marcin SadowskiThe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDynamic changes both in clinical profile and treatment strategy of non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients have been observed recently. The exact impact of them on prognosis in a wide national population remains unclear.

aimTo evaluate the impact of treatment advances between 2005 and 2014 on the outcomes of NSTEMI cases. MATERIAL AND

methodsNSTEMI patients from the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS) were included to the analysis. The mortality rate in a hospital observation as well as in 12-month follow-up was evaluated.

resultsThe frequency of diabetes, hypertension, prior coronary artery interventions (especially percutaneous coronary intervention) raised. A frequency of invasive procedures increased remarkably (coronary angiography from 35.8% to 90.7%;

conclusionsIn last decade the outcomes of NSTEMI in Poland improved substantially. The predominant impact on it had a routine invasive strategy.

Indexed as

invasive treatmentnon ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionoutcomespropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID32368235
PMCPMC7189142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.