ReviewPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2020
The role of optical coherence tomography and other intravascular imaging modalities in cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
Review in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics identify immune-stromal interactions in cardiac allograft vasculopathy.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Single Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Identify Novel Immune-Stromal Interactions in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.Research square · 2025Article
- Revisiting Biomarkers of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Addressing the Achilles Heel of Heart Transplantation.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- Factors associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022Article
- Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current review and future research directions.Cardiovascular research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is the standard-of-care for end-stage heart disease. Although a significant improvement in the prognosis of patients after OHT has been observed in recent years, their overall mortality remains relatively high, with a median survival of approximately 10 years after transplantation. One of the primary causes of death in patients after OHT is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), the condition developing specifically in the coronary vasculature after OHT, the pathophysiology of which is still inadequately known. It is estimated that CAV development and progression is responsible for approximately 30% of deaths within five years post-OHT. According to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Nomenclature for CAV, its presence should be assessed primarily by the coronary angiography performed routinely after OHT, mostly due to its wide availability, reproducibility, and low complication rate. However, the analysis of CAV in coronary angiography has limitations, mostly concerning its - sometimes inadequate - sensitivity and specificity. Hence, there is a growing need for the introduction of more accurate methods of CAV assessment, such as intravascular imaging, which through a thorough evaluation of the arterial wall structure and thickness allows the drawbacks of routine angiography to be minimised. The aim of the article was to critically summarise the current findings derived from the analysis of CAV by optical coherence tomography, the other intravascular imaging modalities, such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and IVUS-derived virtual histology, along with physiological assessment with the use of the fractional flow reserve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.