Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368211›Full record

ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2020

Antibiotic sensitivity of

Mohammed M Aljeldah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.0field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Saudi Arabian Public Health Perspective of Tuberculosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammed M AljeldahDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin, KSA.
University of Hafr Al-Batin · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to examine the antibiotic sensitivity of

methodsA retrospective study was conducted to analyse the antibiotic sensitivity of

resultsWe classified the specimens into two categories: extra-pulmonary and pulmonary TB. Among the extra-pulmonary TB specimens, 36.5% were from body fluids, 29.2% from tissue cultures and 5.2% from body abscesses. In case of pulmonary TB, sputum samples accounted for the highest proportion of the specimens (28.6%), followed by bronchial aspirates and pleural fluid (13.2% and 5.7%, respectively). Clinical isolates from women showed higher resistance to ethambutol compared to those from men. Isoniazid showed the highest resistance pattern among all antibiotics tested (17%). Meanwhile, tissue cultures had higher resistance to Isoniazid antibiotic compared to the other specimens.

conclusionResistance to first-line TB drugs is higher in extra-pulmonary TB isolates than pulmonary isolates. Nearly one-fourth of all

Indexed as

AntibioticsExtra-pulmonaryMycobacterium tuberculosisPulmonaryTuberculosis (TB)

Identifiers

PMID32368211
PMCPMC7184211
OpenAlexW3005578800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.