Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32368180›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2020

Biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in cancer.

D E Meyers, S Banerji

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Self-assembling peptides as immunomodulatory biomaterials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Precision medicine: Uses and challenges.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D E MeyersDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
S BanerjiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, MB.
CancerCare Manitoba · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies that target ctla-4, PD-1, or the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 have received approval in Canada and many parts of the world for the treatment of melanoma, renal cell cancer, urothelial cancer, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. However only a small proportion of patients derive long-term clinical benefit. Here, we describe the biomarkers associated with the complex relationship between tumour-related immune stimulus, T cell-mediated immune response, and immune modulation of the microenvironment that can help to predict improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsbiomarkersctla-4Immune checkpointsPD-1PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID32368180
PMCPMC7194000
OpenAlexW3016683260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.