ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2020
Relating Medical Errors to Medical Specialties: A Mixed Analysis Based on Litigation Documents and Qualitative Data.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in contributing factors to diagnostic errors between physicians and allied health professionals: a nationwide analysis in Japan.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Alarm Fatigue and Medical Error Tendency in Intensive Care Unit Nurses: The Mediating Affect of Role Overload.Nursing in critical care · 2025Article
- Prevalence of adverse events in hip and knee arthroplasties following the implementation of surgical checklists.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Risk factors and management of medical disputes: An analysis of preliminary appraisal reports.PloS one · 2025Article
- Posttraumatic growth for long-term success: Organizational strategies for supporting residents after medical error.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Factors influencing healthcare workers' performance before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis with supplementary comparative analysis.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Medical errors, affected sites, and adverse consequences among patients in the orthopaedic department: Does age matter?Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Medical Dispute Cases Caused by Errors in Clinical Reasoning: An Investigation and Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pre-deployment assessment of an AI model to assist radiologists in chest X-ray detection and identification of lead-less implanted electronic devices for pre-MRI safety screening: realized implementation needs and proposed operational solutions.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
- Gender differences in medical errors among older patients and inequalities in medical compensation compared with younger adults.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence, Important Assistant of Scientists and Physicians.Galen medical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe know a great deal about types, causes, and prevention of medical errors, as well as the risks of each medical specialties. Although we know something about medical errors, much remains to be done in this area particularly around effective prevention. However, little is known about whether medical errors are related to medical specialties. Our objective was to categorize and map the distribution of medical errors and analyze their relationships with medical specialties.
methodsFirst, public cases of medical disputes were searched on "China Judgment Online" according to the key words including medical errors. Second, we set up a database with 5237 medical litigations. After removing unrelated judgment documents, we used systematic random sampling to extract half of these. Then, we hired two frontline physicians with M.D. to review the litigation documents and independently determine the medical errors and the departments in which they took place. A third physician further reviewed the divergent results. After the descriptive statistical analysis and mind map analysis, semi-structured interviews were further conducted with 63 doctors to reveal the relationships mentioned above.
resultsMore than 97.8% of medical errors occurred in clinical departments. The insufficient implementation of informed consent obligations is the top medical error in all medical departments [internal medical departments (12.86%, N=36), surgical departments (14.57%, N=106), specialist departments (13.16%, N=86)]. The types of medical errors in diverse medical departments might be associated with therapeutic means used by physicians. Errors related to surgical operations were common in surgical departments, errors related to diagnoses were common in internal medicine departments, and errors related to therapy were common in specialist departments. A lack of clinical experience and undesirable work system design have contributed to the occurrence of medical errors. Inadequate human resources and unreasonable shift systems have increased the workload of staff members and this has in turn increased the incidence rate of medical errors.
conclusionMedical departments are facing medical errors both in humanity and technology. Medical institutions should be alert to the harm caused by medical humanity (mainly including insufficient communication between physicians and patients, insufficient implementation of infringement of informed consent, infringement of patient's privacy and overtreatment). Improving the clinical skill and vigilance of medical staff is a top priority. Medical institutions should also improve undesirable system designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.