Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367839›Full record

ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society

Clinical profile of lung cancer in North India: A 10-year analysis of 1862 patients from a tertiary care center.

Anant Mohan, Avneet Garg, Aditi Gupta, Satyaranjan Sahu, Chandrashekhar Choudhari, Vishal Vashistha, Ashraf Ansari, Rambha Pandey, Ashu Seith Bhalla, Karan Madan and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association of hTERT MNS16A polymorphism with clinical outcomes of North Indian lung cancer patients undergoing platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of Nanoformulations in the Treatment of Lung Cancer.Recent patents on nanotechnology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Uniqueness of lung cancer in Southeast Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Carcinoma lung with cutaneous metastasis: experience from an Indian institute.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  19. Surgery for lung cancer: insight from a state cancer centre in India.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Anant MohanDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Avneet GargDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Aditi GuptaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Satyaranjan SahuDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Chandrashekhar ChoudhariDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vishal VashisthaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ashraf AnsariDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rambha PandeyDepartment of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashu Seith BhallaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Karan MadanDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vijay HaddaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Hariharan IyerDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepali JainDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh KumarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Saurabh MittalDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pawan TiwariDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ravindra M PandeyDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Randeep GuleriaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver the past few years, the demographic profile of lung cancer has changed. However, most reports are limited by small numbers, short follow-up period, and show an inconsistent pattern. A comprehensive evaluation of changing trends over a long period has not been done. MATERIALS AND

methodsConsecutive lung cancer patients were studied over a 10-year period from January 2008 to March 2018 at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, and relevant clinical information, and survival outcomes were analyzed.

resultsA total of 1862 patients were evaluated, with mean (SD) age of 59 (11.1) years, and comprising 82.9% males. Majority were smokers (76.2%) with median smoking index of 500 (interquartile range [IQR]: 300-800). Adenocarcinoma (ADC) was the most common type (34%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC - 28.6%) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (16.1%). Over the 10-year period, ADC increased from 9.5% to 35.9%, SCC from 25.4% to 30.6%, and non-small cell lung cancer -not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS) decreased from 49.2% to 21.4%. The proportion of females with lung cancer increased although smoking rates remained similar. Majority of NSCLC (95%) continued to be diagnosed at an advanced stage (3 or 4). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements were present in 25.3% and 11.5% ADC patients, respectively. The median overall survival was 8.8 months (IQR 3.7-19) for all patients and 12.57 (IQR 6.2-28.7) months among the 1013 patients who were initiated on specific treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, or surgery). Never-smokers were younger, more likely to be female and educated, had a higher prevalence of ADC and EGFR/ALK mutations, and had better survival.

conclusionAmong this large cohort, our center seems to follow the global trend with increasing incidence of ADC. EGFR mutation positivity was similar to existing reports, while higher ALK positivity was detected. A characteristic phenotype of never-smokers with lung cancer was elucidated which demonstrated better survival.

Indexed as

Indialung cancersmokingtrends

Identifiers

PMID32367839
PMCPMC7353932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.