ArticleBJU international2020
Prostate Health Index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict prostate cancer grade reclassification in active surveillance.
Article in BJU international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS).Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Trial
- The clinical utility of prostate MRI before biopsy.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Article
- Aquablation for LUTS due to BPH in men with localized prostate cancer.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Review
- The combination of prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis: efficacy analysis in different PSA ranges and its clinical decision-guiding value.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- MRI and active surveillance: thoughts from across the pond.European radiology · 2025Review
- Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects.The world journal of men's health · 2025Review
- Prospective comparison of restriction spectrum imaging and non-invasive biomarkers to predict upgrading on active surveillance prostate biopsy.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Article
- Advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with biomarkers for the diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Is Active Surveillance Too Active?Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Prostate health index (PHI) as an accurate prostate cancer predictor.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Observational
- Review
- Nomograms Combining PHI and PI-RADS in Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of Prostate Health Index Results for Prediction of Biopsy Grade Reclassification During Active Surveillance.The Journal of urology · 2022Article
- The modified prostate health index (PHI) outperforms PHI density in the detection of clinical prostate cancer within the PSA grey zone.International urology and nephrology · 2022Article
- Development of a novel nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer with the prostate health index and multiparametric MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Modified Prostate Health Index Density Significantly Improves Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) Detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Prostate Health Index and Multiparametric MRI: Partners in Crime Fighting Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the value of combining the Prostate Health Index (PHI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), tools which have previously been shown to be independently predictive of prostate cancer (PCa) grade reclassification (GR; Gleason score >6), for the purpose of predicting GR at the next surveillance biopsy to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies for men in PCa active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween 2014 and 2019, we retrospectively identified 253 consecutive men in the Johns Hopkins AS programme who had mpMRI and PHI followed by a systematic ± targeted biopsy. PHI and PHI density (PHID) were evaluated across Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2.0 (PI-RADSv2) scores and compared to those with and without GR. Next, the negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated to compare the diagnostic value of PI-RADSv2 score combined with PHI, PHID, or prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) for GR using their respective first quartile as a cut-off.
resultsOf the 253 men, 38 men (15%) had GR. Men with GR had higher PHI values (40.7 vs 32.0, P = 0.001), PHID (0.83 vs 0.57, P = 0.007), and PSAD (0.12 vs 0.10, P = 0.037). A PI-RADSv2 ≤3 alone had a NPV of 91.6% for GR (AUC 0.67). Using a PHI cut-off of 25.6 in addition to PI-RADSv2 ≤3, the NPV and AUC were both increased to 98% and 0.70, respectively. Using a PSAD cut-off of 0.07 ng/mL/mL with PI-RADSv2 had an AUC of 0.69 and NPV of 95.4%. PHI and PI-RADSv2 together could have avoided 20% of biopsies at the cost of missing 2.6% of GRs.
conclusionsThe combination of PHI and mpMRI can aid in the prediction of GR in men on AS and may be useful for decreasing the burden of surveillance prostate biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.