ArticleKlinische Wochenschrift1988
Cyclosporin A treatment in children with minimal change nephrotic syndrome and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.
Article in Klinische Wochenschrift, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Steroid-resistant, cyclosporine-responsive, relapsing nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 1995Trial
- The treatment of minimal change nephrotic syndrome: lessons learned from multicentre co-operative studies.European journal of pediatrics · 1991Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Kidney medicine · 2022Article
- Commentary on "Pediatric Idiopathic Steroid-sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome Diagnosis and Therapy - Short version of the updated German Best Practice Guideline (S2e)".Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Article
- Impact of cyclosporin on podocyte ZO-1 expression in puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis rats.Yonsei medical journal · 2005Article
- Alternative treatment to corticosteroids in steroid sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.Archives of disease in childhood · 1994Article
- In what order should one introduce cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil, cyclosporine or levamisole in a child with steroid-dependent frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 1993Article
- Review
- Long-term low-dose cyclosporin A in steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome of childhood.European journal of pediatrics · 1992Article
- Recurrent haemolytic uraemic syndrome in a boy with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis.European journal of pediatrics · 1992Article
- Practical aspects in the use of cyclosporin in paediatric nephrology.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 1991Review
- Cyclosporin reduces renal blood flow through vasoconstriction of arcuate arteries in the hydronephrotic rat model.Klinische Wochenschrift · 1990Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a pilot study 23 children with nephrotic syndrome were treated with cyclosporin A (Cs) for 6-45 months. 8 children suffered from steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) and had experienced at least one course with cytotoxic drugs, but had relapsed thereafter. 2 children had diabetes mellitus type I with nephrotic syndrome and 13 children had steroid resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Cs was started with 100 mg/m2/day in two doses and increased stepwise to obtain a Cs whole blood trough level of 200-400 ng/ml. In steroid dependent MCNS treatment with Cs reduced relapse rate significantly, and prednisone therapy could be stopped completely. After discontinuation of Cs, relapses reoccurred as frequently as before. Renal function remained unimpaired despite repeated Cs treatment courses up to 38 months. In cases of nephrotic syndrome with diabetes type I Cs treatment led to complete remission without changing the insulin requirement. However, after discontinuation of Cs relapses reoccurred. In steroid resistant FSGS 6 children benefited from Cs treatment: 4 went into complete remission, 2 into partial remission. The 2 children with complete remission relapsed but remained Cs responsive. The remaining 7 children with FSGS did not respond to Cs but continued the course of their disease, with two patients rapidly progressing to terminal renal failure. Side-effects of Cs treatment were mild. It is concluded that Cs is an effective agent in steroid dependent MCNS and can be used as an alternative drug in specific cases like steroid toxicity or diabetes mellitus. In steroid resistant FSGS a trial with Cs seems to be warranted since some cases do respond favorably. To avoid nephrotoxicity treatment with Cs should always be monitored closely by determination of blood levels and renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.