ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Numerical approximation to the general kinetic model for ASL quantification.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved reproducibility for myocardial ASL: Impact of physiological and acquisition parameters.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Numerical approximation to the general kinetic model for ASL quantification.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a numerical approximation to the general kinetic model for arterial spin labeling (ASL) quantification that will enable greater flexibility in ASL acquisition methods. THEORY: The Bloch-McConnell equations are extended to include the effects of single-compartment inflow and outflow on both the transverse and longitudinal magnetization. These can be solved using an extension of Jaynes' matrix formalism with piecewise constant approximation of incoming labeled arterial flow and a clearance operator for outgoing venous flow.
methodsThe proposed numerical approximation is compared with the general kinetic model using simulations of pulsed labeling and pseudo-continuous labeling and a broad range of transit time and bolus duration for tissue blood flow of 0.6 mL/g/min. Accuracy of the approximation is studied as a function of the timestep using Monte-Carlo simulations. Three additional scenarios are demonstrated: (1) steady-pulsed ASL, (2) MR fingerprinting ASL, and (3) balanced SSFP and spoiled gradient-echo sequences.
resultsThe proposed approximation was found to be arbitrarily accurate for pulsed labeling and pseudo-continuous labeling. The pulsed labeling/pseudo-continuous labeling approximation error compared with the general kinetic model was less than 0.002% (<0.002%) and less than 0.05% (<0.05%) for timesteps of 3 ms and 35 ms, respectively. The proposed approximation matched well with customized signal expressions of steady-pulsed ASL and MR fingerprinting ASL. The simulations of simultaneous modeling of flow, T
conclusionWe demonstrate a numerical approximation of the "Bloch-McConnell flow" equations that enables arbitrarily accurate modeling of pulsed ASL and pseudo-continuous labeling signals comparable to the general kinetic model. This enables increased flexibility in the experiment design for quantitative ASL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.