Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367549›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2020

A tractable method to account for high-dimensional nonignorable missing data in intensive longitudinal data.

Chengbo Yuan, Donald Hedeker, Robin Mermelstein, Hui Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A primer on intensive longitudinal psychometrics.Behavior research methods · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chengbo YuanDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-0908
Donald HedekerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-6094
Robin MermelsteinDepartment of Psychology and School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Hui XieDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Social-Emotional Contexts of Adolescent Smoking PatternsP01CA098262 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI DIVIAK, KATHLEEN · 2004 to 2014
$26.3M
Statistical Qualification of the Impact of Missing Data in EMA StudiesR01CA178061 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI XIE, HUI · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA098262NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the need for sensitivity analysis to nonignorable missingness in intensive longitudinal data (ILD), such analysis is greatly hindered by novel ILD features, such as large data volume and complex nonmonotonic missing-data patterns. Likelihood of alternative models permitting nonignorable missingness often involves very high-dimensional integrals, causing curse of dimensionality and rendering solutions computationally prohibitive to obtain. We aim to overcome this challenge by developing a computationally feasible method, nonlinear indexes of local sensitivity to nonignorability (NISNI). We use linear mixed effects models for the incomplete outcome and covariates. We use Markov multinomial models to describe complex missing-data patterns and mechanisms in ILD, thereby permitting missingness probabilities to depend directly on missing data. Using a second-order Taylor series to approximate likelihood under nonignorability, we develop formulas and closed-form expressions for NISNI. Our approach permits the outcome and covariates to be missing simultaneously, as is often the case in ILD, and can capture U-shaped impact of nonignorability in the neighborhood of the missing at random model without fitting alternative models or evaluating integrals. We evaluate performance of this method using simulated data and real ILD collected by the ecological momentary assessment method.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLinear Modelslinear mixed effects modelmissing datanonignorabilitynonlinear sensitivity indexsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID32367549
PMCPMC7415513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.