Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367507›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2020

Critical Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib, the Three Approved Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment.

Vijayabhaskar Veeravalli, Ranjeet P Dash, Jennifer A Thomas, R Jayachandra Babu, Lakshmi Mohan Vamsi Madgula, Nuggehally R Srinivas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Effect ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Vijayabhaskar VeeravalliSyngene International Limited, Biocon Park, SEZ, Bangalore, India.
Ranjeet P DashDepartment of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Jennifer A ThomasADME-DMPK, Charles River Laboratories, Ashland, OH, USA.
R Jayachandra BabuDepartment of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Lakshmi Mohan Vamsi MadgulaSyngene International Limited, Biocon Park, SEZ, Bangalore, India.
Nuggehally R SrinivasKenox Pharmaceuticals Inc., Jersey City, NJ, USA. srini.suramus@yahoo.com.
Ashland (United States) · USAuburn University · USBiocon (India) · INCharles River Laboratories (United States) · USEloxx Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USSyngene International (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of novel, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitors namely tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib has provided an alternative treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis outside of traditional drugs and expensive biologics. This review aimed to critically assess the drug-drug interaction potential of tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib and provide a balanced perspective for choosing the most appropriate Janus kinase inhibitor based on the needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis including co-medications and renal/hepatic impairment status. Based on the critical assessment, all three approved Janus kinase inhibitors generally provide a favourable opportunity for co-prescription with a plethora of drugs. While cytochrome P450 3A4-related inhibition or induction altered the exposures (area under the curve) of tofacitinib and upadacitinib, it did not impact the exposure of baricitinib. Transporter drug-drug interaction studies revealed that the disposition of baricitinib was altered with certain transporter inhibitors as compared with either tofacitinib or upadacitinib. Adjustment of tofacitinib or baricitinib dosages but not that of upadacitinib is required with the progression of renal impairment from a mild to a severe condition. While the dosage of tofacitinib needs to be adjusted for patients with moderate hepatic impairment status, it is not the case for either baricitinib or upadacitinib. Assessment of the drug-drug interaction potential suggests that tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib generally show a favourable disposition with no perpetrator activity; however, as victim drugs, they show subtle pharmacokinetic differences that may be considered during polypharmacy. Moreover, careful choice of the three drugs could be made in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with varying degrees of renal/hepatic impairments.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsPharmacokineticsAnimalsAntirheumatic AgentsAzetidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansJanus KinasesPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesSulfonamidesAntirheumatic AgentsAzetidinesbaricitinibHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingJanus KinasesPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesSulfonamidestofacitinibupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID32367507
OpenAlexW3023319481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.