Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367349›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2020

The diagnostic role of diffusional kurtosis imaging in glioma grading and differentiation of gliomas from other intra-axial brain tumours: a systematic review with critical appraisal and meta-analysis.

Gehad Abdalla, Luke Dixon, Eser Sanverdi, Pedro M Machado, Joey S W Kwong, Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths, Antonio Rojas-Garcia, Daisuke Yoneoka, Jelle Veraart, Sofie Van Cauter and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Gehad AbdallaThe Neuroradiological Academic Unit, BRR, UCL IoN, London, UK. g.abdalla@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4282-6906
Luke DixonThe Neuroradiological Academic Unit, BRR, UCL IoN, London, UK.
Eser SanverdiThe Neuroradiological Academic Unit, BRR, UCL IoN, London, UK.
Pedro M MachadoMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases & Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.
Joey S W KwongJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Jasmina Panovska-GriffithsNIHR CLAHRC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Antonio Rojas-GarciaNIHR CLAHRC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Daisuke YoneokaDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Jelle VeraartChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sofie Van CauterUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ahmed M Abdel-KhalekDepartment of Radiology, Mansoura university hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt.
Magdy SetteinDepartment of Radiology, Mansoura university hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt.
Tarek YousryThe Neuroradiological Academic Unit, BRR, UCL IoN, London, UK.
Sotirios BisdasThe Neuroradiological Academic Unit, BRR, UCL IoN, London, UK.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity College London · GBChampalimaud Foundation · PTChinese University of Hong Kong · HKLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMansoura University · EGThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Christopher M Collins · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Medical Research Council MR/M009106/1NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aim to illustrate the diagnostic performance of diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the diagnosis of gliomas.

methodsA review protocol was developed according to the (PRISMA-P) checklist, registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) and published. A literature search in 4 databases was performed using the keywords 'glioma' and 'diffusional kurtosis'. After applying a robust inclusion/exclusion criteria, included articles were independently evaluated according to the QUADAS-2 tool and data extraction was done. Reported sensitivities and specificities were used to construct 2 × 2 tables and paired forest plots using the Review Manager (RevMan®) software. A random-effect model was pursued using the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristics.

resultsA total of 216 hits were retrieved. Considering duplicates and inclusion criteria, 23 articles were eligible for full-text reading. Ultimately, 19 studies were eligible for final inclusion. The quality assessment revealed 9 studies with low risk of bias in the 4 domains. Using a bivariate random-effect model for data synthesis, summary ROC curve showed a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 and estimated sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.92) in high-/low-grade gliomas' differentiation. A mean difference in mean kurtosis (MK) value between HGG and LGG of 0.22 (95% CI 0.25-0.19) was illustrated (p value = 0.0014) with moderate heterogeneity (I

conclusionDKI shows good diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of high- and low-grade gliomas further supporting its potential role in clinical practice. Further exploration of DKI in differentiating IDH status and in characterising non-glioma CNS tumours is however needed.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Tensor ImagingGliomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeoplasm GradingDiagnosisDiffusion-weighted imagingGliomasMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID32367349
PMCPMC7311378
OpenAlexW3023875097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.