ArticleJournal of medical systems2020
Intentions Recognition of EEG Signals with High Arousal Degree for Complex Task.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards the Applicability of Measuring the Electrodermal Activity in the Context of Process Model Comprehension: Feasibility Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel electroencephalography (EEG) evoked paradigm based on neurological rehabilitation. By implementing a conceptual model "cup-and-ball" system, EEG signals in manipulating the dynamic constrained objects are generated. Based on the operational EEG signals, a method is proposed to recognize different mental intentions. Under the manipulating task with a high arousal level, common spatial patterns (CSP) is used to extract and optimize features of the EEG signals from ten participants. Quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) is implemented on EEG signals in different dimensions to identify different EEG patterns. The cross-validation is used to make classifier adaptive to a given data set. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are presented to illustrate recognition performance. The classification effect of QDA is verified by paired t-test (P < 0.001). Based on the proposed method, the average accuracy of mental intentions is 0.9857 ± 0.0191 and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.9665 ± 0.0291. The performance of QDA is also compared with the other three classifiers such as the support vector machine (SVM), the decision tree (DT) and the k-nearest neighborhood (k-NN) rule. The results suggest that the proposed method is very competitive with other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32367317What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.