Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367188›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Angiography-based quantitative coronary contrast-flow ratio measurements correlate with myocardial ischemia assessed by stress MRI.

Karsten Lenk, Valentin Schwarzbach, Marios Antoniadis, Maximilian Blum, Samira Zeynalova, Andreas Hagendorff, David Leistner, Ulf Landmesser, Daniel Lavall, Ulrich Laufs

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karsten LenkDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. karsten.lenk@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-4159
Valentin SchwarzbachDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Marios AntoniadisDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Maximilian BlumDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Samira ZeynalovaInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas HagendorffDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
David LeistnerDepartment of Cardiology, Charité Berlin University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Charité Berlin University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel LavallDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Ulrich LaufsDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio (cQFR) is a new technology for quantitative evaluation of coronary stenosis using computational fluid dynamics based on angiograms. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of cQFR to detect myocardial ischemia using stress magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference standard. Patients who received stress MRI and coronary angiography were selected from the hospital database. Relevant ischemia on stress MRI was defined as a perfusion deficit in ≥ 2 of 16 segments. cQFR was quantitated based on 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography using QAngio XA3D1.1 software by two blinded and independent investigators. A cQFR of ≤ 0.80 was considered abnormal. Among 87 patients 230 vessels met the criteria for full analysis by cQFR (88%). In vascular territories with a significant perfusion deficit, cQFR was significantly lower compared to areas with normal perfusion (0.72 (0.62-0.78) vs. 0.96 (0.89-0.99); p < 0.001). The sensitivity of cQFR in detecting significant epicardial stenoses of coronary vessels with documented ischemia in stress MRI was 81% (68-90%), the specificity was 88% (82-92%). Diameter stenoses (DS) and area stenoses (AS) in vessels with positive stress MRI were significantly higher than in vessels without ischemia (DS 59.1% (49.4-68.4%) vs. 34.8% (27.1-46.1%) p < 0.001; AS 75.6% (63.0-85.2%) vs. 45.0% (30.8-63.6%), p < 0.001). The analysis reveals a high correlation between coronary stenosis measured by cQFR and ischemic areas detected by stress MRI. The data set the stage to plan randomized studies assessing cQFR measurements with regard to clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAgedBlood Flow VelocityCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsComputational fluid dynamicsCoronary artery diseaseNon-invasive imagingQuantitative coronary angiographyStress MRI

Identifiers

PMID32367188
PMCPMC7381441
OpenAlexW3021785403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.