Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367145›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Velocity influences the relative contributions of visual and vestibular cues to self-acceleration.

Darren M Kenney, Shannon O'Malley, Hannah M Song, Ben Townsend, Martin von Mohrenschildt, Judith M Shedden

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darren M KenneyDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. kenneydm@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-4213
Shannon O'MalleyDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Hannah M SongDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ben TownsendDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Martin von MohrenschildtDepartment of Computing and Software, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Judith M SheddenDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Foundation for Innovation 2009M00034Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPGP-2014-00051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-motion perception is based on the integration of visual (optic flow) and vestibular (inertial) sensory information. Previous research has shown that the relative contribution of visual and vestibular cues can change in real time based on the reliability of that information. The present study assessed whether initial velocity and acceleration magnitude influence the relative contribution of these cues to the detection of self-acceleration. Participants performed a simple response time task with visual and vestibular self-acceleration cues as targets. Visual optic flow was presented at three possible initial velocities of 3, 9, or 15 m/s, and accelerated to result in three possible final velocities of 21, 27, or 33 m/s. Corresponding vestibular cues were presented at magnitudes between 0.01 and 0.04 g. The self-acceleration cues were presented at three possible stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs): visual-first (by 100 ms), in-sync, and vestibular-first (by 100 ms). We found that presenting the cues in-sync resulted in the fastest responses across all velocities and acceleration magnitudes. Interestingly, presenting the visual cue first resulted in a relative advantage over vestibular-first at the slowest initial velocity of 3 m/s, and vice versa for the fastest initial velocity of 15 m/s. The fastest overall responses for visual-first and in-sync were observed at 9 m/s. The present results support the hypothesis that velocity of optic flow can alter the relative contribution of visual and vestibular cues to the detection of self-acceleration.

Indexed as

CuesAccelerationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementOptic FlowProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultAccelerationMotion simulatorMultisensory integrationOptic flowResponse timesSelf-motionVelocityVestibular system

Identifiers

PMID32367145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.