Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367144›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2020

Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity.

Marta Castellano, David Ibañez-Soria, Eleni Kroupi, Javier Acedo, Michela Campolo, Aureli Soria-Frisch, Josep Valls-Sole, Ajay Verma, Giulio Ruffini

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta CastellanoStarlab Barcelona SL, Av. del Tibidabo 47 bis, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
David Ibañez-SoriaStarlab Barcelona SL, Av. del Tibidabo 47 bis, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Eleni KroupiStarlab Barcelona SL, Av. del Tibidabo 47 bis, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier AcedoNeuroelectrics SLU, Av. del Tibidabo 47 bis, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Michela CampoloEMG Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clinic and IDIBAPS (Institut d'Inveatigació Agustí Pi i Sunyer), Facultat de Medicina, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Aureli Soria-FrischStarlab Barcelona SL, Av. del Tibidabo 47 bis, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Valls-SoleEMG Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clinic and IDIBAPS (Institut d'Inveatigació Agustí Pi i Sunyer), Facultat de Medicina, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ajay VermaBiogen Inc., 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Giulio RuffiniNeuroelectrics Corp., 2 10 Broadway, Suite 201, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. giulio.ruffini@neuroelectrics.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0177
Starlab Barcelona SLU (Spain) · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESBiogen (United States) · USCenter for Dielectrics & Piezoelectrics · US

Funding

Biogen 1CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) interacts with brain activity. Here, we investigate the effects of tACS using an intermittent tACS-EEG protocol and use, in addition to classical metrics, Lempel-Ziv-Welch complexity (LZW) to characterize the interactions between task, endogenous and exogenous oscillations. In a cross-over study, EEG was recorded from thirty participants engaged in a change-of-speed detection task while receiving multichannel tACS over the visual cortex at 10 Hz, 70 Hz and a control condition. In each session, tACS was applied intermittently during 5 s events interleaved with EEG recordings over multiple trials. We found that, with respect to control, stimulation at 10 Hz ([Formula: see text]) enhanced both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] power, [Formula: see text]-LZW complexity and [Formula: see text] but not [Formula: see text] phase locking value with respect to tACS onset ([Formula: see text]-PLV, [Formula: see text]-PLV), and increased reaction time (RT). [Formula: see text] increased RT with little impact on other metrics. As trials associated with larger [Formula: see text]-power (and lower [Formula: see text]-LZW) predicted shorter RT, we argue that [Formula: see text] produces a disruption of functionally relevant fast oscillations through an increase in [Formula: see text]-band power, slowing behavioural responses and increasing the complexity of gamma oscillations. Our study highlights the complex interaction between tACS and endogenous brain dynamics, and suggests the use of algorithmic complexity inspired metrics to characterize cortical dynamics in a behaviorally relevant timescale.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectroencephalographyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultBrain WavesCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleVisual CortexYoung AdultAlgorithmic complexityEntrainmentLZWoscillationsTranscranial stimulationVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID32367144
OpenAlexW3022401419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.