Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367072›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2020

Survival benefit of tamoxifen in male breast cancer: prospective cohort analysis.

Holm Eggemann, Cosima Brucker, Michael Schrauder, Marc Thill, Felix Flock, Mattea Reinisch, Serban-Dan Costa, Atanas Ignatov

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Holm EggemannDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. holm.eggemann@klinikum-magdeburg.de.
Cosima BruckerBreast Unit, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.
Michael SchrauderBreast Unit, Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany.
Marc ThillBreast Unit, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Felix FlockBrast Unit, Brustzentrum/Klinikum Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany.
Mattea ReinischBreast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Serban-Dan CostaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Atanas IgnatovDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEAgaplesion Markus Hospital · DEKernkraftwerk Gundremmingen · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEKlinikum Aschaffenburg · DENuremberg Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the lack of prospective data, current treatment of male breast cancer (MBC) is based on information obtained from retrospective analysis or by extrapolation from studies on female patients. In this prospectively enrolled cohort study, we retrospectively examined the survival effect of tamoxifen in MBC patients.

methodsIn this prospectively enrolled cohort study, 448 patients with MBC were treated between May 2009 and June 2018. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

resultsBetween May 2009 and June 2018, 448 men with breast cancer were identified, with a median age at diagnosis of 69 years (range 27-96 years). The median follow-up was 39 months (range 3-89 months). Most tumours were larger than 20 mm; invasive ductal carcinoma was of no special histological type and with an intermediate grade of differentiation. Almost half of the men were diagnosed with positive axillary lymph nodes (43.5%). Hormone receptor (HR) positivity was observed in 98.4% of the patients. Notably, DFS among men who did not receive tamoxifen was significantly reduced as compared with those who underwent tamoxifen therapy (P = 0.002). The recurrence rate and mortality in the group of patients without and with tamoxifen treatment were 18.2% and 11.2%, respectively. The most common localisation of metastases was the bone. After adjustment for prognostic factors, we found that tamoxifen was found to reduce the recurrence rate by 68% (hazard ratio HR = 0.32; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.14-0.74).

conclusionsTamoxifen treatment was associated with improved DFS for MBC patients. CLINICAL

trial registrationDRKS00009536.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast Neoplasms, MaleDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID32367072
PMCPMC7341811
OpenAlexW3022053221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.