Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32367009›Full record

SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2020

PARP inhibitors as a new therapeutic option in metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Raffaele Ratta, Annalisa Guida, Florian Scotté, Yann Neuzillet, Asmahane Benmaziane Teillet, Thierry Lebret, Philippe Beuzeboc

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CACYBP knockdown inhibits progression of prostate cancer via p53.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate and Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raffaele RattaOncology and Supportive Care Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France. r.ratta@hopital-foch.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2445-415X
Annalisa GuidaDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Florian ScottéOncology and Supportive Care Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Yann NeuzilletUrology Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Asmahane Benmaziane TeilletOncology and Supportive Care Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Thierry LebretUrology Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Philippe BeuzebocOncology and Supportive Care Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Hôpital Foch · FRUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA great number of DNA-damage repair (DDR) pathways have been recognized to be frequently dysregulated in advanced stages of prostate cancer. DNA-repair defects in prostate cancer represents a clinically relevant disease subset. Tumors whose ability to repair double-strand DNA breaks by homologous recombination is compromised, are highly sensitive to blockade of the repair of DNA single-strand breaks via the inhibition of the enzyme poly(ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP).

methodsA systematic review of the literature has been conducted in January 2020 using PubMed Medline database in line with the recommendations from the PRISMA guidelines. The following string terms were used for searching clinical trial articles: castration resistant OR castrate resistance OR castration refractory AND prostate cancer AND PARP OR poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor OR DNA-repair OR homologous recombination repair. On-going clinical trials with olaparib, niraparib, talazoparib, veliparib, and rucaparib in mCRPC were searched on the clinicalTrials.gov website.

resultsFrom this research 176 articles were identified. After title screening and abstract reading, five papers and four abstract were considered for the systematic review. Thirty-two clinical trials were also identified: from these 16 trials which did not include mCRPC patients or only prostate cancer patients, trials not yet recruiting and trials including radio-metabolic treatments were excluded. Sixteen trials were included and discussed in the paper.

conclusionsOlaparib has been the first agent showing a benefit in terms of rPFS and ORR alone or in combination with abiraterone plus prednisone in patients with DDR deficiency prostate cancer. Also rucaparib showed a benefit in terms of PSA response rate and ORR in patients with BRCA2 and BRCA1 mutation in a phase-II study. Other phase-III clinical trials are evaluating niraparib and talazoparib, alone or in combination with AR signaling inhibitors.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinClinical Trials as TopicHumansMaleMutationNeoplasm MetastasisPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32367009
OpenAlexW3023296125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.