Observational studyInternational journal of impotence research2021
Long-term outcomes of surgery for Peyronie's disease: focus on patient satisfaction.
Observational study in International journal of impotence research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plaque incision and grafting for peyronie's disease: 15-year experience and functional outcomes from a high-volume andrology centre.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Comparison of long-term patient reported outcomes of excisional and incisional corporoplasties for Peyronie's disease.Basic and clinical andrology · 2025Article
- Response to comment on: penile prosthesis implantation is safe and effective in Peyronie's disease patients with and without erectile dysfunction.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Insurance approval rates for collagenase clostridium histolyticum prior to discontinuation: a Canada-wide analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immediate outcomes of surgery for Peyronie's disease (PD) are fairly easy to analyze. However, it is the patient-reported long-term outcomes which eventually determine the success of PD treatment. The goal of this observational study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with results of surgical treatment for PD at long-term follow-up. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were completely satisfied with their erectile function and penile appearance. We retrospectively identified 374 patients who underwent surgery for PD (median follow-up: 9.5 years) and attempted to invite them for follow-up visit; 342 patients were available for follow-up. Only 285 (83.3%) were sexually active. Among all patients, 197 (57.6%) were completely satisfied with penile appearance; among sexually active patients, 139 (40.6%) were completely satisfied with their erections. Only 101 patients (29.5%) were completely satisfied with penile appearance and erectile function. Logistic regression analysis revealed preoperative IIEF-EF score (OR = 1.668 per 1 point; 95% CI 1.469-1.894), tunica albuginea plication (OR = 5.599; 95% CI = 1.014-30.92), use of saphenous vein (OR = 8.517; 95% CI = 2.491-29.115), and cadaveric pericardium (OR = 61.388; 95% CI = 7.674-491.11) as significant predictors of satisfaction with erectile function. Severity of curvature (OR = 0.926 per 5°; 95% CI = 0.907-0.946) and tunica plication (OR = 0.117; 95% CI = 0.019-0.738) were negative predictors of satisfaction with penile appearance. Preoperative IIEF-EF (OR = 1.497 per 1 point; 95% CI = 1.322-1.694), severity of penile curvature (OR = 0.967 per 5°; 95% CI = 0.95-0.983), and use of pericardium allograft (OR = 10.728; 95% CI = 1.363-84.46) were predictors of both endpoints (satisfaction with erectile function and cosmesis). Despite excellent surgical outcomes in PD, patients' satisfaction with penile appearance and erectile function is far from absolute and depends on many patient-related and treatment-related factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.