Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366981›Full record

ArticleNature plants2020

Global synthesis of effects of plant species diversity on trophic groups and interactions.

Nian-Feng Wan, Xiang-Rong Zheng, Li-Wan Fu, Lars Pødenphant Kiær, Zhijie Zhang, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Matteo Dainese, Jiaqi Tan, Shi-Yun Qiu, Yue-Qing Hu and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Positive effects of species mixing on biodiversity of understory plant communities and soil health in forest plantations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nian-Feng Wan *Eco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Low-carbon Agriculture, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-3316
Xiang-Rong Zheng *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li-Wan FuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lars Pødenphant KiærDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zhijie ZhangDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Rebecca Chaplin-KramerNatural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Matteo DaineseInstitute for Alpine Environment, EURAC Research, Bolzano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-5572
Jiaqi TanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shi-Yun QiuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yue-Qing HuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5730-0317
Wei-Dong TianState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ming NieMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0702-8009
Rui-Ting JuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Yu DengDepartment of Plant Protection, School of Agriculture and Food Science, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China.
Jie-Xian JiangEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Low-carbon Agriculture, Shanghai, China. jiangjiexian@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3567-8201
You-Ming CaiEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Low-carbon Agriculture, Shanghai, China. cym59059@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2903-4250
Bo LiMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. bool@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-5666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that plant species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning in terrestrial ecosystems, including diversity effects on insects (herbivores, predators and parasitoids) and plants. However, the effects of increased plant diversity across trophic levels in different ecosystems and biomes have not yet been explored on a global scale. Through a global meta-analysis of 2,914 observations from 351 studies, we found that increased plant species richness reduced herbivore abundance and damage but increased predator and parasitoid abundance, predation, parasitism and overall plant performance. Moreover, increased predator/parasitoid performance was correlated with reduced herbivore abundance and enhanced plant performance. We conclude that increasing plant species diversity promotes beneficial trophic interactions between insects and plants, ultimately contributing to increased ecosystem services.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemPlantsAnimalsHerbivoryInsectaPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.